Systematic position of Habrodon (Habrodontaceae, Musci) as inferred from nuclear ITS1 and ITS2 and chloroplast trnL intron and trnL–trnF spacer sequence data
Anastasiya A. Budyakova, Michael S. Ignatov, Svetlana P. Yatsentyuk, Alexey V. Troitsky

Literature Cited
AKIYAMA, H. & N. NISHIMURA. 1993. Further studies of branch buds in mosses; “Pseudoparaphyllia” and “Scaly leaves”. J. Plant Res. 106: 101 108. Google Scholar, Crossref
Arikawa, T. & M. Higuchi. 2003. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of Pylaisia (Hypnaceae, Musci) and its relatives based on rbcL gene sequence. – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 94: 87-106. Google Scholar
Brotherus, V. F. 1905-1909. Musci (Laubmoose). II. Pleurocarpi. — In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 1(3): 701-768 (1905); 769-864 (1906); 865-1008 (1907); 1009-1152 (1908); 1153-1173 (1909). W. Engelmann, Leipzig. Google Scholar
Brotherus, V. F. 1923. Die Laubmoose Fennoskandia. – Fl. Fennica 1. xiii + 635 pp.Google Scholar, www
Brotherus, V. F. 1925. Musci. — In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die Natьrlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, W. Engelmann, Leipzig, 11: 1-522. Google Scholar
Buck, W. R. 1977. A taxonomic investigation of Juratzkaea Lor. and Juratzkella gen. nov. – Rev. Bryol. Lichenol. 43(3): 309-325. Google Scholar
Buck, W. R. & H. CRUM 1978. A re-interpretation of the Fabroniaceae with notes on selected genera. – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 44: 347-369. Google Scholar
Buck, W. R. & H.A. Crum. 1990. An evaluation of familial limits among the genera traditionally aligned with the Thuidiaceae and Leskeaceae. - Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 17: 55-69.Google Scholar
Buck, W. R. & B. Goffinet. 2000. Morphology and classification of mosses. – In: Shaw, A. J. & B. Goffinet (eds.) Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press: 71-123.Google Scholar
Buck, W. R., B. Goffinet & A. J. Shaw. 2000. Novel relationships in Pleurocarpous mosses as revealed by cpDNA sequences. — Bryologist 103(4): 774-789. Google Scholar, Crossref
Coleman, A.W. 2003. ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolution comparisons. – Trends in Genetics 19, No. 7. Google Scholar
Corley, M.F.V., A.C. Crundwell, R. Düll, M.O. Hill & A.J.E. Smith. 1981. Mosses of Europe and the Azores: an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. Journal of bryology 11: 609 689.Google Scholar, Crossref
Cox, C. J., B. Goffinet, A. E. Newton, A. J. Shaw & T. A. J. Hedderson. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the diplolepidous-alternate mosses (Bryidae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence. Bryologist 103(2): 224-241. Google Scholar, Crossref
Crosby, M. R., R. E. Magill, B. Allen & S. He. 1999. A Checklist of the Mosses. - St. Louis, Missouri Bot. Garden Press: 306 pp.Google Scholar
Enroth, J. 1994. A taxonomic revision of the genus Pinnatella (Neckeraceae, Bryopsida). – Acta Bot. Fennica 151: 1-90. Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783 791. Google Scholar, Crossref
Fleischer, M. 1915. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg 3: i-xxxi, 1104-1729. E. J. Brill, Leiden. Google Scholar, Crossref
Goffinet, B. C.J. Cox, A.J. Shaw & T.A.J. Hedderson. 2001. The Bryophyta (Mosses): systematic and evolutionary inferences from an rps4 Gene (cpDNA) phylogeny. Annals of Botany 87: 191 208.Google Scholar, Crossref
Hedenäs, L. 1987. North European mosses with axillary rhizoids, a taxonomic study. — J. Bryol. 14: 429-439. Google Scholar
Hedenäs, L. 1992. Flora of Madeiran pleurocarpous mosses (Isobryales, Hypnobryales, Hookeriales). — Bryoph. Bibl. 44: 1-165. Google Scholar
Hedenäs, L. 1995. Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses a cladistic overview J. Bryol. 18: 723-781. Google Scholar, Crossref
Hedenäs, L. & N. Pedersen. 2002. Nomenclatural consequences of a phylogenetic study of the Plagiotheciaceae. - Bryologist 105: 325-326.Google Scholar, Crossref
Huelsenbeck, J. & F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754 755. Google Scholar, Crossref
Huttunen, S. & M. S. Ignatov. 2004. Phylogeny of the Brachytheciaceae (Bryophyta) based on morphology and sequence level data. Cladistics 20: 151 183. Google Scholar, Crossref
Huttunen, S., M. S. Ignatov, K. Müller, and D. Quandt,. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Lembophyllaceae. – Monographs in Systematic Botany 98: 328-361.Google Scholar
Huttunen, S., M. S. Ignatov, K. Müller, and D. Quandt,. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Lembophyllaceae. – Monographs in Systematic Botany 98: 328-361.Google Scholar
IGNATOV, M.S. 1999. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. LXIII. On the pseudoparaphyllia in Brachytheciaceae and Meteoriaceae (Musci). – Acta Bot. Fennica 165: 73-83.Google Scholar, www
IGNATOV, M.S., H. ANDO, E.A. IGNATOVA. 1996. Bryophyte flora of Altai Mountains. VII. Hypnaceae and related pleurocarps with be- or ecostate leaves. – Arctoa 6: 21-112.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov, M.S. & S. Huttunen. 2002. Brachytheciaceae (Bryophyta) – a family of sibling genera. Arctoa 11: 245–296.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov, M.S. & R. Ochyra. 1995. On the systematic position of Myurella and Bardunovia, genus novus (Plagiotheciaceae, Musci). - Arctoa 5: 45-59.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatova, E.A. & M.S. Ignatov. 2003. Habrodon perpusillus (Habrodontaceae, Musci) - a new family, genus and species for Russia. - Arctoa 12: 133-136.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ireland, R.R. 1971. Moss Pseudoparaphyllia. Bryologist 74: 312 330.Google Scholar, Crossref
Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. – J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111-120. Google Scholar, Crossref
Nyholm, E. 1960. Illustrated Moss Flora of Fennoscandia. II. Musci. – 4: 287-408. Lund, CWK Gleerup. Google Scholar
Pedersen, N. & L. Hedenäs. 2002. Phylogeny of the Plagiotheciaceae based on molecular and morphological evidence Bryologist 105: 310-324.Google Scholar, Crossref
Posada, D & K.A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. – Bioinformatics 14: 817-818. Google Scholar, Crossref
Saitou, N. & M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425. Google Scholar, www
Schimper, W. P. 1860. Synopsis Muscorum Europaeorum, praemissa introductione de elementis bryologicis tractante. – Stuttgartiae. Sumptibus Librariae E. Schweizerbart. CLIX+735+8 Tabl. Google Scholar, www
Smith, A. J. E. 1978. Moss Flora of Britain & Ireland. – Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press. 706 pp. Google Scholar
STECH, M., D. QUANDT & W. FREY. 2003. Molecular circumscription of the hornworts (Anthocerophyta) based on the chloroplast DNA trnL-trnF region. – J. Plant Res. 116: 389-398.Google Scholar, Crossref
Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analyses using parsimony (and other methods). – Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Google Scholar
Taberlet, P. , L. Gielly, G. Pautou & J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105 1109. Google Scholar, Crossref
Tsubota, H., T. Arikawa, H. Akiyama, E. De Luna, D. Gonzales, M. Higuchi & H. Deguchi. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of hypnobryalean mosses as inferred from the large scale dataset of chloroplast rbcL, with special reference on the Hypnaceae and possibly related families. - Hikobia 13: 645-665.Google Scholar, www
Van de Peer, Y & R. De Wachter. 1997. Construction of evolutionary distance trees with TREECON for Windows: accounting for variation in nucleotide substitution rate among sites. – Comp Appl. Biosci. 13: 227-230. Google Scholar
Vanderpoorten, A. , L. Hedenäs, C. J. Cox & A. J. Shaw. 2002. Circumscription, classification, and taxonomy of the Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data and morphology Taxon 51: 115-122. Google Scholar, www
VANDERPOORTEN, A., L. HEDENÄS, C. COX & A.J. SHAW. 2002. Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 1-21.Google Scholar, Crossref
Vohra, J. N. 1969 [1971]. A new species of Habrodon and some unrecorded species of mosses from India. — Bull. Bot. Survey India 11: 70-75. Google Scholar
White, T.J., T. Bruns, S. Lee & J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. – In: (Innis M.A., D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Snisky & T.J. White eds.) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, CA: 315-322.Google Scholar
Zharkikh, A. A, A. Y. Rzhetsky, P. S. Morozov, T. L. Sitnikova & J. S. Krushkal. 1990. A package of microcomputor programs for sequence analysis and construction of phylogenetics. – Gene 101: 251-254. Google Scholar