On the leaf development in Palaeozoic mosses of the order Protosphagnales
Elena V. Maslova, Yuliya V. Mosseichik, Igor A. Ignatiev, Oleg V. Ivanov, Michael S. Ignatov

Literature Cited
[Abramov, I.I. & L.I. Savicz-Lyubitskaya] Абрамов, И.И. & Л.И Савич-Любицкая. 1963. Отдел Bryopsida. – [Division Bryopsida].В кн.: Орлов Ю.А. (ред.) Основы палеонтологии, том “Водоросли, мхи, псилофиты, плауновые, членистостебельные, папоротники. М., Госгеолтехиздат [In Osnovy paleontologii, Volume “Vodorosli, mkhi, psilofity, plaunovye, chlenistostebelnye, paporotniki” (Ed Yu. A. Orlov), Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow]: 344-414.Google Scholar, www
Andrews, H.N. Jn. 1961. Studies in paleobotany. – New York & London: John Wiley & Sons, 487 pp.Google Scholar
Darrah, W.C. 1960. Principles of palaeobotany. – New York: Ronald Press Cp., VII+295 pp.Google Scholar
[Donskov, D.G.] Донсков Д.Г. 2012. Реконструкция морфогенеза листа мхов и его связи с формой листа и особенностями биологии видов. – [Retrospective restoration of moss leaf morphogenesis and its relation to leaf shape and species biology] Автореф. канд. бил. наук. М., ГБС РАН [Abstract of PhD. Thesis, Moscow GBS RAN], 23 pp.Google Scholar
[Fefilova, L.A.] Фефилова Л.А. 1978. Листостебельные мхи перми Европейского Севера СССР. – [Permian mosses of European North of USSR] Л., Наука [Leningrad, Nauka],120 pp.Google Scholar
Frahm, J.P. 2010.Die Laubmossflora des Baltischen Bernsteinwaldes. – Jena, Weissdorn Verlag. 101 pp.Google Scholar
Frey, W. 1970 [1971]. Blattentwicklung bei Laubmoosen. – Nova Hedwigia 20: 463-556. Google Scholar, www
[Gomankov, A.V. & S.V. Meyen] Гоманьков А.В., С.В. Мейен. 1987. Татариновая флора (состав и распространение в поздней перми Евразии). – [Tatarina flora (composition and distribution in the Late Permian of Eurasia)] Труды геол. ин-та АН СССР [Trudy Geol. Inst. Akad.Nauk SSSR] 401: 1-174.Google Scholar
[Ignatiev, I.A. & D.A. Ignatiev] Игнатьев И.А., Д.А.Игнатьев. 2001. Эволюция растительности и условия осадконакопления в поздней перми котловины Большая Сыня Предуральского прогиба. – [Evolution of the vegetation and of the conditions of sedimentation in the Late Permian of Bolshaia Synia depression of the Uralian Foredeep] Материалы симпозиума памяти Сергея Викторовича Мейена (1935–1987), Москва, 25-26 декабря. 2000. М. ГЕОС [Transactions of the Symposium, dedicated to the memory of Sergei Viktorovich Meyen (1935–1987). Moscow, December 25–26, 2000. M: GEOS]: 178-186.Google Scholar
Ignatov, M.S. 1990. Upper Permian mosses from the Russian Platform. Palaeontographica, Abt. B, 217: 147–189 + Pl. 1-9.Google Scholar, www
Ignatov, M.S. 1992. Bryokhutuliinia jurassica, gen. et spec. nova, a remarkable fossil moss from Mongolia. – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 71: 377-388.Google Scholar
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2011. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine). Arctoa 20: 1–18.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov, M.S. & D.E. Shcherbakov. 2007. Did pleurocarpous mosses originate before the Cretaceous? – In: Newton, A.E. & R. Tangney (eds.) Pleurocarpous mosses: systematics and evolution. (Syst. Ass. Special Vol. 71) CRC Press, Boca Raton–London–New York: 321-336.Google Scholar
Ignatov, M.S. & D.E. Shcherbakov. 2009. A new fossil moss from the Lower Permian of the Russian Far East. – Arctoa 18: 201-212.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ivanov, O.V. & M.S. Ignatov. 2013. 2D Digitization of plant cell areolation by polarized light microscopy. Cell and Tissue Biology 7(1): 103-112.Google Scholar, Crossref
Krassilov, V.A. 1973. Mesozoic bryophytes from the Bureja Basin, Far East of the USSR. – Palaeontographica, Abt. B, 143: 95-105 + Pl. 41-51.Google Scholar
Lorentz, P.G. 1864. Studien über Bau und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Laubmoose. Lorentz P.G., Moosstudien: 1–36.Google Scholar
Menning M. , A. S. Alekseev, B. I. Chuvashov, V. I. Davydov, F. -X. Devuyst, H. C. Forke, T. A. Grunt, L. Hance, P. H. Heckel, N. G. Izokh, Y. -G. Jin, P. J. Jones, G. V. Kotlyar, H. W. Kozur, T. I. Nemyrowska, J. W. Schneider, X. -D. Wang, K. Weddige, D. Weyer & D. M. Work. 2006. Global time scale and regional stratigraphic reference scales of Central and West Europe, East Europe, Tethys, South China, and North America as used in the Devonian-Carboniferous-Permian Correlation Chart. 2003. (DCP 2003). –Palaeogeogr. , Palaeocliatol. , Palaeoecol. 240: 318-372. Google Scholar
Meyen, S.V. 1982. The Carboniferous and Permian floras of Angaraland (a synthesis). – Biol. Mem. 7: 1–110.Google Scholar
Miller, N.G. 1983.Tertiary and Quanternary fossils. – In: Schuster, R.M. (ed.), New manual of bryology, vol. 2, Nichinan, Hattori Botanical Laboratory: 1194-1237.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (Berol). 1898. Musci (Laubmoose). Fortpflanzungsverhältnisse und Entwiklungsgeschichte. – In Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds. ) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig, Verlag W. Engelmann 1(3): 155-202. Google Scholar
[Neuburg, M.F.] Нейбург М.Ф. 1960. Листостебельные мхи из пермских отложений Ангариды. – [Mosses from the Permian of Angaraland] Труды ГИН АН СССР [Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR] 19: 1-104 + 78 pl.Google Scholar
[Pukhonto, S.K.] Пухонто С.К. 1998. Пермская стратиграфия и флора угольных отложений Печерского бассейна. – [Permian stratigraphy and flora of coal deposits of the Pechora Basin]. М., Научный Мир [Moscow, Nauchny Mir], 312 pp.Google Scholar
Wu, X.-W., X.-Y. Wu & Y.-D. Wang. 2000. Two new forms of Bryiidae (Musci) from the Jurassic of Junggar Basin in Xinjiang, China. – Acta Palaeontol. Sinica 39, Suppl: 167-175.Google Scholar, www