Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine), 3. Pottiodicranum, a new moss genus from the Late Eocene
Michael S. Ignatov, Alfons Schäfer-Verwimp, Evgeny E. Perkovsky, Jochen Heinrichs

Literature Cited
Caspary, R. & R. KLEBS. 1907. Die Flora des Bernsteins und anderer fossiler Harze des ostpreussischen Tertiдrs. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt N.F. 4: 1–181. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dlussky, G. M. & A. P. Rasnitsyn. 2009. Ants (Insecta: Vespida: Formicidae) in the Upper Eocene amber of Central and Eastern Europe. Paleontological Journal 43(9): 1024–1042.Google Scholar, Crossref
Frahm, J.-P. 2001. Neue Laubmoosfunde aus sдchsischem und baltischem Bernstein. Nova Hedwigia 72: 271–281.Google Scholar, Crossref
Frahm, J.-P. 2004. A new contribution to the moss flora of Baltic and Saxon amber. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 129: 81 101.Google Scholar, Crossref
Frahm, J.-P. 2005. The genus Hypnodontopsis (Bryopsida, Rhachitheciaceae) in Baltic and Saxon amber. Bryologist 108(2): 228–235.Google Scholar, www
Frahm, J.-P. 2010. Die Laubmoosflora des Baltischen Bernsteinwaldes. Jena, Weissdorn Verlag, 101 pp.Google Scholar, www
Goeppert, H.R. 1853. Über die Bernsteinflora. Monatsberichte der Kцniglich PreuЯischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin: 450– 477.Google Scholar
Goeppert, H.R. & G.C. Berendt. 1845. Der Bernstein und die in ihm befindlichen Pflanzenreste der Vorwelt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Goffinet,B., W.R. Buck & A.J. Shaw. 2009. . Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: B. Goffinet & A.J. Shaw, eds. Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 55–138.Google Scholar
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2011. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine). Arctoa 20: 1–18.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2013. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine), 2. Arctoa 22: 83–92.Google Scholar, Crossref
Liehmann, G. 2013. Die maschinelle Gewinnung und Aufbereitung des Bernsteins im Tagebau Goitsche bei Bitterfeld ein Erlebnisbericht. Exkursionsführer und Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 249: 24–30.Google Scholar
Nadein, K.S., E.E. Perkovsky & A.G. Moseyko. 2016. New Late Eocene Chrysomelidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Baltic, Rovno and Danish ambers. Papers in Palaeontology 2(1): 117–137.Google Scholar
Perkovsky, E.E., V.Yu. Zosimovich & A.P. Vlaskin. 2003. Rovno amber insects: first results of analysis. Russian Entomological Journal 12(2): 119–126.Google Scholar, www
Perkovsky, E.E., A.P. Rasnitsyn, A.P. Vlaskin & M.V. Tatarchuk. 2007. A comparative analysis of Baltic and Rovno amber arthropod faunas: perspective samples. African Invertebrates 48: 229–245.Google Scholar
Perkovsky,E.E., V.Yu. Zosimovich & A.P. Vlaskin . 2010. Rovno amber. In: Penney, D. Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits. Siri Sci. Press., Rochdale: 116–136.Google Scholar
Perkovsky, E. E. 2011. Syninclusions of the Eocene winter ant Prenolepis henshei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Germaraphis aphids (Hemiptera: Eriosomatidae) in Late Eocene Baltic and Rovno amber: some implications. Russian Entomological Journal 20(3): 303–313.Google Scholar, www
Perkovsky, E.E. 2016. Tropical and holarctic ants in Late Eocene ambers. Vestnik zoologii 50(2): 111–122.Google Scholar
Zander, R. H. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 32: 378 pp. Google Scholar