Literature Cited |
Blomquist,H.L. & L.L. Robertson. . 1941 . The development of the peristome in Aulacomnium heterostichum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 65: 569–584.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Brotherus,V.F. . 1924 . Musci. In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2, 10. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot: 143–478.Google Scholar
|
Budke,J.M., C.S. Jones & B. Goffinet. 2007. Development of the enigmatic peristome of Timmia megapolitana (Timmiaceae; Bryophyta). American Journal of Botany 94(3): 460–467.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Cox,C.J., B. Goffinet, N.J. Wickett, S.B. Boles & A.J. Shaw. 2010. Moss diversity: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175–195.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Edwards,S.R. 1979. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepideous moss peristomes. In: Clarke, G.C.S. & J.G. Duckett (eds.). Bryophyte systematics. Academic Press, London, UK.: 317–346.Google Scholar
|
Edwards,S.R. 1984. Homologies and inter-relations of moss peristomes. In: Schuster, R.M. (ed.) New manual of bryology, vol. 2. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan: 658–695.Google Scholar
|
Evans,A.W. & H.D. Hooker, jr. 1913. Development of the peristome in Ceratodon purpureus. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 40: 97–109.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
FEDOSOV,V.E., A.V. FEDOROVA, A.E. FEDOSOV & M.S. IGNATOV. 2016. Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae s.l. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 139–155.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Frey,W. & M. Stech. 2009. Bryophyta (Musci, mosses). In: Frey, W. (ed.). Syllabus of plant families A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Part 3. Bryophytes and seedless vascular plants. 13th ed. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany: 116–257.Google Scholar
|
Goffinet,B., W.R. Buck & A.J. Shaw. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B. & A.J. Shaw (eds.). Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 55–138.Google Scholar
|
Goffinet,B., J. Shaw, L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1999. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. V. Diplolepideae: Orthotrichaceae. Bryologist 102: 581–594.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Haeckel,E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen : allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirete Descendenz-Theorie. Berlin.Google Scholar
|
HORTON,D.G. 1982. A revision of the Encalyptaceae (Musci) with particular reference to the north American taxa Part I. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 53: 365–418.Google Scholar
|
Horton,D.G. 1983. A revision of the Encalyptaceae (Musci) with particular reference to the north American taxa Part II. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 54: 353–532.Google Scholar
|
Ignatov,M.S., U.N. Spirina, E.A. Ignatova, M. Krug & D. Quandt. 2015. On the systematic position of the moss genus Catoscopium, with a new approach to the peristome reduction study. Arctoa 24(2): 389-415.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Ignatov,M.S., V.E. Fedosov, A.V. Fedorova & E.A. Ignatova. 2016. On the systematic position of Discelium (Bryophyta). Arctoa 25(2): 278–284.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Kienitz-Gerloff,F. 1878. Untersuchungen uber die Entwick-lungsgeschichte der Laubmooskapsel und die Embryoen- twicklung einiger Polypodiaceen. Botanische Zeitung 36: 33–64.Google Scholar
|
Kreulen,S.J.W. 1972. Features of single- and double-peristome capsules. Homology of layers and ontogeny of outer spore sac. Lindbergia 1: 153–160.Google Scholar
|
Liu,Y., J.M. Budke & B. Goffinet. 2012. Phylogenetic inference rejects sporophyte based classification of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta): rapid radiation suggests rampant homoplasy in sporophyte evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 130–145. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.010.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Loeske,L. 1929. Funariaceae. Die Laubmoose Europas (Loeske), Bd. 2. Max Lande, Berlin, 120 pp.Google Scholar
|
Medina,R., M. Johnson, Y. Liu, N. Wilding, T. A. J. Hedderson, N. Wickett & B. Goffinet. 2018. Evolutionary dynamism in bryophytes: Phylogenomic inferences confirm rapid radiation in the moss family Funariaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 120: 240–247.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
MUELLER,D. M. J. 1973. The peristome of Fissidens limbatus Sullivant. University of California Publications in Botany 63: 1–34.Google Scholar
|
Neesvon Esenbeck, C. G. D., C. F. Hornschuch & J. J. W. Sturm. 1827. Bryologia Germanica. Bd. 2(1). Friedrich Fleischer, Leipzig, 182 pp.Google Scholar
|
Newton,A.E., C.J. Cox, J.G. Duckett, J.A. Wheeler, B. Goffinet, T.A.J. Hedderson & B.D. Mishler. 2000. Evolution of the major moss lineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. Bryologist 103: 187–211.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Nyholm,E. 1998. Illustrated flora of Nordic Mosses. Fasc. 4. Aulacomniaceae Meesiaceae – Catoscopiaceae – Bartramiaceae – Timmiaceae – Encalyptaceae – Grimmiaceae – Ptychomitriaceae – Hedwigiaceae – Orthotrichaceae. – Nordic Bryological Society, Copenhagen & Lund, pp. 249–405.Google Scholar
|
Philibert,H. 1889. Etude sur la péristome. Huitiиme article. Difference entre les Nématodontées et les Arthrodontéees; transition entre ces deux groupes (Suite). Revue Bryologique 16: 1–9, 39–44, 67–77.Google Scholar
|
Saito,S. 1956. Studies on the development of the peristome in Musci II. On the peristome in Dicranum japonicum Mitt. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 69(812): 53–59.Google Scholar
|
Saito,S. & S. Shimoze. 1955. Studies on the development of the peristome in Musci I. On the peristome in Bartramia crispula Schimp. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 69(812): 53–59.Google Scholar
|
Schwartz,O.M. . 1994 . The development of the peristome-forming layers in the Funariaceae. International Journal of Plant Science 155: 640–657.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Schimper,W.P. 1876. Synopsis Muscorum Europeorum. 2d ed. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 866 pp.Google Scholar
|
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. . 1987 . Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution 1. Diphyscium foliosum (Diphysciaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 45: 55–70.Google Scholar
|
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. . 1989. a. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 14: 24–36.Google Scholar
|
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. . 1989. b. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution IV. Haplolepideae: Ditrichaceae and Dicranaceae. Bryologist 92: 314–323.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Shaw,J. & K. Renzaglia. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of Bryophytes. American Journal of Botany 91(10): 1557–1581.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Shaw,A.J. & H. Robinson. . 1984 . On the development, evolution, and function of peristome in mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 57: 319–335.Google Scholar
|
Shaw,A.J., P. Szövényi & B. Shaw. 2011. Bryophyte diversity and evolution: windows into the early evolution of land plants. American Journal of Botany 98(3): 352–369.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
TAYLOR,E. C. 1962. The Philibert peristome articles. An abridged translation. Bryologist 65: 175–212.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Tsubota,H., E. De Luna, D. González, M.S. Ignatov & H. Deguchi. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic and ordinal relationships based on analyses of a lage-scale datd set of 600 rbcL sequences of mosses. Hikobia 14: 149–170.Google Scholar
|
YOUNG,R.L. G.S. BEVER, Z. WANG & G.P. WAGNER. 2011. Identity of the avian wing digits: Problems resolved and unsolved. Developmental Dynamics 240: 1042–1053.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
ZHU,J. & S. MACKEM. 2013. a. Analysis of mutants with altered shh activity and posterior digit loss supports a biphasic model for shh function as a morphogen and mitogen. Developmental Dynamics 240(5): 1303-1310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22637Google Scholar
|
ZHU,J. & S. MACKEM. 2013. b. Tracing the Evolution of Avian Wing Digits. Current Biology 23(12): R538-R544.Google Scholar, Crossref
|