Bioclimatic modeling of Crossidium squamiferum (Viv.) Jur. (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) distribution
Denis V. Sandanov, Olga Yu. Pisarenko

Literature Cited
Austin,M.P. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200: 1–19.Google Scholar, Crossref
[Bardunov,L.V.] Бардунов Л.В. 1989. Аридные виды во флоре мхов Южной Сибири. [The arid species in the South Siberian moss flora] В кн.: Проблемы бриологии в СССР (ред. И.И. Абрамов) Л., Наука [In: Abramov I.I. (ed.) Problemy Bryologii v SSSR, Leningrad, Nauka]: 30–36.Google Scholar
Désamoré,A.E., B. Laenen, M. Ctech, B. Papp, L. Hedenäs, R.G Mateo & A. Vanderpoorten. 2012. How do temperate bryophytes face the challenge of a changing environment? Lessons from the past and predictions for the future. Global Change Biology 18: 2915–2924.Google Scholar, Crossref
Dudov,S.V. 2017. Modeling of species distribution with the use of topography and remote sensing data on the example of vascular plants of the Tukuringra ridge low mountain belt (Zeya State Nature Reserve, Amur Oblast). Biology Bulletin Reviews 7(3): 246–257.Google Scholar, Crossref
Elith,J. & J.R. Leathwick. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systematics 40: 677–697.Google Scholar, Crossref
Feeley,K.J. & M.R. Silman. 2011. Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought. Diversity and Distributions 17: 1132–1140.Google Scholar, Crossref
[Gudkova,P.D., M.V. Olonova & D.S. Feoktistov] Гудкова П.Д., М.В. Олонова, Д.С. Феоктистов. 2017. Сравнение эколого-климатических ниш двух видов ковылей Stipa sareptana A.K. Becker и S. krylovii Roshev. (Poaceae). – [The comparison of ecologo-climatic niches of two species feather grass Stipa sareptana A.K. Becker and S. krylovii Roshev. (Poaceae)] Ukrainian Journal of Ecology 7(4): 263–269.Google Scholar, Crossref
Guisan,A. & N. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147–186.Google Scholar, Crossref
Hijmans,R.J., S.E. Cameron, J.L. Parra, P.G. Jones & A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965–1978.Google Scholar, Crossref
Hodgetts,N.G. 2015. Checklist and country status of European bryophytes towards a new Red List for Europe. Irish Wildlife Manuals 84: 1–125.Google Scholar
Ignatov,M.S. 1994. Bryophytes of Altai Mountains. I. Study area and history of its bryological exploration. Arctoa 3: 13–27.Google Scholar, Crossref
[Ignatov,M.S. & E.A. Ignatova] Игнатов М.С., Е.А. Игнатова . 2003. Флора мхов средней части европейской России. Т. 1. [Moss flora of the Middle European Russia. Vol. 1] М., КМК [Moscow, KMK], 608 с.Google Scholar
Ignatov,M.S., O.M. Afonina, E.A. Ignatova et al. 2006. Check-list of mosses of East Europe and North Asia. Arctoa 15: 1–130.Google Scholar, Crossref
Kürschner,H. 2004. Life Strategies and Adaptations in Bryophytes from the Near and Middle East. Turkish Journal of Botany 28: 73–84.Google Scholar
Kürschner,H. 2008. Biogeography of South-West Asian Bryophytes with special emphasis on the tropical element. – Turkish Journal of Botany 32: 432–446.Google Scholar
Magill,B., J. Solomon & H. Stimmel. 2016. Tropicos Specimen Data. Missouri Botanical Garden. Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/hja69f accessed via GBIF.org on 2018-06-14.Google Scholar
Mateo,R.G., A. Vanderpoorten, J. Muсoz, B. Laenen & A.E. Désamoré. 2013. Modeling species distributions from heterogeneous data for the biogeographic regionalization of the European bryophyte flora. PLoS ONE 8(2): e55648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055648Google Scholar
O‘Shea,B. 2006. Checklist of the mosses of sub-Saharan Africa (version 5, 12/06). Tropical Bryology Research Reports, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 6:1–252.Google Scholar
Phillips,S., R. Anderson & R. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 190:231–259.Google Scholar, Crossref
Phillips,S.J. & M. Dudik. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161–175.Google Scholar, Crossref
Phillips,S.J. 2017. A Brief Tutorial on Maxent. http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent. Accessed on 13 June 2018.Google Scholar
Sabovljević,M., R. Natcheva, G. Dihoru, E. Tsakiri, S. Dragićević, A. Erdaр & B. Papp. 2008. Check-list of the mosses of SE Europe. Phytologia Balcanica 14(2): 207–244.Google Scholar
Sandanov,D. V., B.B. Naidanov & D.G. Chimitov. 2016. Current distribution and impact of future climate change on East-Asian plant diversity. Abstracts of International Biogeography Society Special Meeting: The Biogeography of Ecology. Beijing: 82.Google Scholar
[Sandanov,D.V. & B.B. Naidanov] Санданов Д.В., Б.Б. Найданов. 2015. Пространственное моделирование ареалов восточно-азиатских видов растений: современное состояние и динамика под влиянием климатических изменений. [Spatial modeling of East-Asian plant species distribution: current condition and future dynamic under climatic change] Растительный мир Азиатской России [Rastitel’ny mir Aziatskoi Rossii] 3(19): 30–35.Google Scholar
[Tsegmed,Ts.] Цэгмэд Ц. 2010. Флора мхов Монголии. [Moss flora of Mongolia] Москва, Российская академия наук и Академия наук Монголии [Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences and Mongolian Academy of Sciences], 634 pp.Google Scholar
Song,S., X. Liu, X. Bai, Y. Jiang, X. Zhang, C. Yu & X. Shao. 2015. Impacts of environmental heterogeneity on moss diversity and distribution of Didymodon (Pottiaceae) in Tibet, China. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132346Google Scholar, Crossref
Tubanova,D.Ya., O.Yu. Pisarenko & V.E. Fedosov. 2017. New moss records from Republic Buryatia. 12. In: Sofronova, E.V. (ed.) New bryophyte records. 9. Arctoa 26: 224–225.Google Scholar, Crossref
Uyar,G. & B.Cetin. 2004. A new check-list of mosses of Turkey Journal of Bryology 26: 203–220.Google Scholar, Crossref