| Literature Cited |
| ANTONOV, A.S., A.V. TROITSKY, T.H. SAMIGULLIN, V.K. BOBROVA, K.M. VALIEJO-ROMAN & W. MARTIN. 2000. Early events in the evolution of angiosperms deduced from cp rDNA ITS2-4 sequence comparisons. – In: Proc. Intern. Symp. on the family Magnoliaceae (18-22 May,. 1998, Guangzhou, China): 210-214. Google Scholar
|
|
| BACZKIEWICZ, A. & J. SZWEYKOWSKI. 2001. Geographical distribution of Haplomitrium hookeri (Hepaticae, Calobryales) in Poland. – Pol. Bot. J. 46(1): 83-88. Google Scholar, www
|
|
| BECKERT, S., H. MUHLE, D. PRUCHNER & V. KNOOP. 2001. The mitochondrial nad2 gene as a novel marker locus for phylogenetic analysis of early land plants: a comparative analysis in mosses. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18(1): 117-126. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| BECKERT, S., S. STEINHAUSER & H. MUHLE. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of bryophytes based on nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial nad5 gene. Plant Syst. Evol. 218: 179-192.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| BOPP, M. & I. CAPESIUS. 1996. New aspects of bryophyte taxonomy provided by molecular approach. – Bot. Acta 109: 1-5. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| BRUMMIT, R.K. 1999. Does botanical nomenclature need to change in the new millenium? – In: Abstr. XVI Intern. Bot. Congr. (1-7 August, 1999, St. Louis, USA): 9. Google Scholar
|
|
| CAROTHERS, Z.B. & J.G. DUCKETT. 1979. Spermatogenesis in the systematics and phylogenyof the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae. – In: Clarke, G.S.C. & J.G. Duckett (eds.) Bryophyte Systematics. London: 425-445. Google Scholar
|
|
| CAROTHERS, Z.B. & J.G. DUCKETT. 1980. The bryophyte spermatozoid: a source of new phylogenetic information. – Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107: 281-297. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| CRANDALL-STOTLER, B.J. 1984. Musci, hepatics and anthocerotes- an assay on analogies. – In: Shuster, R.M. (eds.) New manual of bryology, vol. 1. Nichinan, The Hattory Botanical Laboratory: 1093-1117.
Google Scholar
|
|
| CRANDALL-STOTLER, B.J. 1986. Morphogenesis, developmental anatomy and bryophyte phylogenetics; contraindications of monophyly. – J. Bryol. 14: 1-23.
Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| CRUM, H. 2001. Structural diversity of bryophytes. Ann Arbor, The Univ. of Michigan, pp. 379.
Google Scholar
|
|
| DUCKETT, J.G., Z.B CAROTHERS & C.C.J. MILLER. 1982. Comparative spermatology and bryophyte phylogeny. – J. Hattory Bot. Lab. 53: 107-125. Google Scholar
|
|
| DUCKETT, J.G., Z.B CAROTHERS & C.C.J. MILLER. 1983. Gametogenesis. – In: Shuster, R.M. (eds.) New manual of bryology, vol. 1. Nichinan, Hattory Botanical Laboratory: 232-275. Google Scholar
|
|
| EDWARDS, D. & L. AXE. 2000. Novel conducting tissues in Lower Devonian plants. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134: 383-399. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| EDWARDS, D., C.H. WELLMAN & L. AXE. 1998. The fossil record of early land plants and interrelationships between primitive embryophytes: too little and too late? – In: Bates, J.W., N.W. Ashton, J.G. Duckett (eds.) Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds, The British Bryological Society and Maney Publishing: 15-44. Google Scholar
|
|
| EDWARDS, D., J.G. DUCKETT & J.B. RICHARDSON. 1995. Hepatic characters in the earliest land plants. – Nature 374: 635-636. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783 791. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| GALTIER, N. & M. GOUY. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. – PNAS 92: 11317-11321. Google Scholar
|
|
| GARBARY, D.J. & K.S. RENZAGLIA. 1998. Bryophyte phylogeny and the evolution of land plants: evidence from development and ultrastructure. – In: Bates, J.W., N.W. Ashton, J.G. Duckett (eds.) Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds, The British Bryological Society and Maney Publishing: 45-63. Google Scholar
|
|
| GOEBEL, K. 1902. Ьber Homologien in der Entwicklung mдnnlicher und weiblichen Geschlechtsorgane. – Flora 90: 279-305.
Google Scholar
|
|
| GOREMYKIN, V., V. BOBROVA, J. PAHNKE, A. TROITSKY, A. ANTONOV & W. MARTIN. 1996. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support Gnetalean affinities to angiosperms. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 383-396. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| GOULD, S.J. 1978. Ontogeny and phylogeny. – London, Harvard Univ. Press, 501 pp.
Google Scholar
|
|
| GRAHAM, L.E., M.E. COOK & J.S. BUSSE. 2000. The origin of plants: body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation. – PNAS 97(9): 4535-4500. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Hedderson, t.a., r. chapman & c.j. cox. 1998. Bryophytes and the origins and diversification of land plants: evidence from molecules. – In: Bates, J.W., N.W. Ashton, J.G. Duckett (eds.) Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds, The British Bryological Society and Maney Publishing: 65-77. Google Scholar
|
|
| IGNATOV, M.S. & E.A. IGNATOVA. 2001. On the zoochory of Schistostega pennata (Schistostegaceae, Musci). – Arctoa 10: 83-96.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Kelchner, S.A. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482–498.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| KENRICK, P. & P.R. CRANE. 1997b. The origin and early diversification of land plants: a cladistic study. – Washington, Smithsonian Institute press. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| KENRICK, P. & P.R. CRANE. 1997b. The origin and early diversification of land plants: a cladistic study. – Washington, Smithsonian Institute press. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| LEWIS L.A., B.D. MISHLER & R. VILGALYS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. – Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7(3): 377-393. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Malek, O., K. LATTIG, R. HIESEL, A. BRENNICKE & V. KNOOP. 1996. RNA editing in bryophytes and a molecular phylogeny of land plants. – EMBO J. 15: 1403-1411. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| [MEYER, K.I.] МЕЙЕР, К.И. 1958. Морфогения высших растений. – [Morphogeny of land plants] Москва, Изд. Московского университета [Moscow, Moscow University], 255 pp.
Google Scholar
|
|
| MISHLER, B.D. 2000. Deep phylogenetic relationships among “plants” and their implications for classification. – Taxon 49: 661-683.
Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| MISHLER, B.D. & S.P. CHURCHILL. 1984. A cladistic approach to the phylogeny of the “bryophytes”. – Brittonia 36: 406-424. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| MURRAY, M.G. & W.F. THOMPSON. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. – Nucl. Acids Res. 8: 4321-4325. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Newton, A. E., C. J. Cox, J. G. Duckett, J. A. Wheeler, B. Goffinet, T. A. J. Hedderson & B. D. Mishler. 2000. Evolution of the major moss lineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. Bryologist 103: 187 211.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| NICKRENT D.L., C.L. PARKINSON, J.D. PALMER & R.J. DUFF. 2000. Multigene phylogeny of land plants with special reference to bryophytes and the earliest land plants. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 17(12): 1885-1895. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| nishiyama, t. & m. kato. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic analysis among bryophytes and tracheophytes based on combined data of plastid coded genes and the 18S rRNA gene. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 16(8): 1027-1036. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| QIU, Y.-L. & J.D. PALMER. 1999. Phylogeny of early land plants: insights from genes and genomes. – Trends in Plant Science 4(1): 26-30. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| QIU, Y.-L., Y. CHO, J.C. COX & J.D. PALMER. 1998. The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants. – Nature 394: 671-674. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| [RASNITSYN, A.P.] РАСНИЦЫН, А.П. 1983. Филогения и систематика. – [Phylogenetics and systematics] В кн.: Теоретические проблемы современной биологии. Пущино, Научный центр биологических исследований [In: Teoreticheskiye problemy sovremennoi biologii]: 41-49.
Google Scholar
|
|
| Rernzaglia, K.S., K.D. McFarland & D.K. Smith. 1997. Anatomy and ultrastructure of the sporophyte of Takakia ceratophylla (Bryophyta). American Journal of Botany 84(10): 1337-1350.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| RENZAGLIA, K.S., R.J. DUFF, D.L. NICKRENT & D.J. GARBARY. 2000. Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny. – Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 355: 769-793. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Saitou, N. & M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425. Google Scholar, www
|
|
| SAMIGULLIN T.H., K.M. VALIEJO-ROMAN, A.V. TROITSKY, V.K. BOBROVA, V.R. FILIN, W. MARTIN & A.S. ANTONOV. 1998. Sequences of rDNA internal transcribed spacers from the chloroplast DNA of 26 bryophytes: ptoperties and phylogenetic utility. – FEBS Lett. 422: 47-51. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Schuster, R.M. 1966. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America, east of the hundredth meridian, vol. 1. – New York, Columbia Univ. Press, 802 pp.
Google Scholar
|
|
| SCHUSTER, R.M. 1984. Evolution, phylogeny and classification of the Hepaticae. – In: Shuster, R.M. (eds.) New manual of bryology, vol. 1. Nichinan, The Hattory Botanical Laboratory: 892-1070.
Google Scholar
|
|
| [SHATALKIN, A.I.] ШАТАЛКИН, А.И. 1988. Биоло-гическая систематика. – [Biological systematics] Москва, Изд. Московского университета [Moscow, Moscow University], 184 pp.
Google Scholar
|
|
| Smith, A.J.E. 1986. Bryophyte phylogeny: fact or fiction? – J. Bryol. 14: 83-89.
Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Smith, g.m. & P.G. Davidson. 1993. Antheridia and sporophytes in Takakia ceratophylla (Mitt.) Grolle: evidence for reclassification among the mosses. – J. Hattory Bot. Lab. 73: 263-271. Google Scholar
|
|
| SMITH, G.M. 1955. Cryptogamic botany, vol. II. – New York, McGraw-Hill, 399 pp.
Google Scholar, www
|
|
| Strimmer, K. & A. von Haeseler. 1996. Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 964-969. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Swofford, D.L. 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Google Scholar
|
|
| Tamura, K. & M. Nei. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. – Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512-526. Google Scholar, www
|
|
| VITT, D.H., B. GOFFINET & T. HEDDERSON. 1998. The ordinal classification of mosses: Questions and answers for the. 1990s. – In: Bates, J.W., N.W. Ashton, J.G. Duckett (eds.) Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds, The British Bryological Society and Maney Publishing: 113-123. Google Scholar
|
|
| WELLMAN, C.H., D. EDWARDS & L. AXE. 1998. Permanent dyad in sporangia and spore masses from the Lower Devonian of the Welsh Borderland. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 127: 117-147. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| WENDEL, J.F. & J.J DOYLE. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. – In: Soltis, P.S., D.E. Soltis, J.J. Doyle (eds.) Molecular systematics of plants II. Boston, Kluwer Academic Press: 265-296. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| YANG, Z. 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. – Syst. Biol. 47(1): 125-133.
Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| Zharkikh, A. A., A.Yu. Rzhetsky, P.S. Morozov, T.L. Sitnikova & J.S. Krushkal. 1990. A package of microcomputer programs for sequence analysis and construction of phylogenetics. – Gene 101: 217-218. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|