On the branch development in Leucodon (Leucodontaceae, Bryophyta)
Uliana N. Spirina, Michael S. Ignatov

Literature Cited
Akiyama, H. 1987. Morphology and anatomy of the peristome of Dozya japonica (Musci) and reconsideration of its affinity to the Leucodontaceae. - Bryologist 90(4): 409-416.Google Scholar, Crossref
Berthier, J. 1971 [1972]. Recherches sur la structure et le développement de l'apex du gamétophyte feuillé des mousses. - Rev. Bryol. Lichénol. 38: 421-551. Google Scholar
Cox, C.J., B. Goffinet, N.J. Wickett, S.B. Boles & A.J. Shaw. 2010. Moss diversity: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175 195.Google Scholar, Crossref
Gardiner, A. , M. Ignatov, S. Huttunen & A. Troitsky. 2005. On resurrection of the families Pseudoleskeaceae Schimp. and Pylaisiaceae Schimp. (Musci, Hypnales). Taxon 54: 651–663. Google Scholar
GOFFINET, B., W.R. BUCK & A. J. SHAW. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. – In: Goffinet, B. & A. J. Shaw (eds.) Bryophyte Biology, 2d ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge: 55-138.Google Scholar
Frey, W. & M. Stech. 2009. Bryophyta (Musci, mosses). – In: W. Frey (ed.), Syllabus of plant families A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Part 3. Bryophytes and seedless vascular plants. 13th ed., 116-257. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar, www
Huttunen, S., M. S. Ignatov, K. Müller, and D. Quandt,. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Lembophyllaceae. – Monographs in Systematic Botany 98: 328-361.Google Scholar
IGNATOV, M.S. 1999. Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. LXIII. On the pseudoparaphyllia in Brachytheciaceae and Meteoriaceae (Musci). – Acta Bot. Fennica 165: 73-83.Google Scholar, www
Ignatov, M., A. Gardiner, V. Bobrova, I. Milyutina, S. Huttunen & A. Troitsky. 2007. On relationships of mosses of the order Hypnales, with the special reference to taxa traditionally classified in Leskeaceae. – In: Newton, A.E. & R. Tangney (eds.) Pleurocarpous mosses: systematics and evolution. CRC Press, Boca Raton-London-New York (Systematic Association Special Volume 71): 177-213.Google Scholar
IGNATOV, M.S. & L.HEDENÄS. 2007. Homologies of stem structures in pleurocarpous mosses especially of pseudoparaphyllia and similar organs. – In: A.E. Newton & R. Tangney, eds. Pleurocarpous mosses: systematics and evolution. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 71: 269-286.Google Scholar
[IGNATOV, M.S. & E.A. IGNATOVA] ИГНАТОВ М.С., Е.А. ИГНАТОВА. 2004. Флора мхов средней части европейской России. Т.2. – [Moss flora of the Middle European Russia. Vol.2] М., КМК [Moscow, KMK]: 609-944.Google Scholar
Leitgeb, H. 1868. Wachstum des Stammchens von Fontinalis. - Sitz. d. K. Ak. Wiss. Math. Natur. 57(1): 308-342.Google Scholar
SPIRINA, U.N. & M.S. IGNATOV. 2005. Comparison of early stages of branch development in Brachythecium and Calliergon (Bryophyta). Arctoa 14: 211–222.Google Scholar, Crossref
SPIRINA, U. N. & M. S. IGNATOV. 2008. Branch development and pseudoparaphyllia of Hypnum cupressiforme (Hypnales, Musci). Arctoa 17: 139-160. Google Scholar, Crossref
Tsubota, H. , E. De Luna, D. Gonzбlez, M. S. Ignatov & H. Deguchi. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic and ordinal relationships based on analyses of a lage-scale datd set of 600 rbcL sequences of mosses. Hikobia 14: 149–170. Google Scholar
Troitsky, A. V. , M. S. Ignatov, V. K. Bobrova & I. A. Milyutina. 2007. Contribution of genosystematics to current concepts of phylogeny and classification of Bryophytes. Biochemistry (Moscow) 72(12): 1368 1376. Google Scholar, Crossref