Literature Cited |
Aleksandrova, G. N. & N. I. Zaporozhets. 2008. a. Palynological characteristics of Upper Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits on the west of the Sambian Peninsula (Kaliningrad region), Part 1. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16: 295 316. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Aleksandrova, G. N. & N. I. Zaporozhets. 2008. b. Palynological characteristics of Upper Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits on the west of the Sambian Peninsula (Kaliningrad region), Part 2. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16: 528 539. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Alekseev, V.I. 2013. The beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Baltic amber: the checklist of described species and preliminary analysis of biodiversity. Zoology and Ecology 23(1): 5–12.Google Scholar
|
Alekseev, V.I. & P.I. Alekseev. 2016. New approaches for reconstruction of the ecosystem of an Eocene Amber Forest. Biology Bulletin 43: 75–86.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Caspary, R. & R. Klebs. 1907. Atlas von dreissig Tafeln zu der Abhandlung: Die Flora des Bernsteins und anderer fossiler Harze des ostpreussischen Tertiдrs. Abhandlungen der Kцniglich Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Berlin.Google Scholar
|
Engel, M.S. 2001. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 259: 1–192.Google Scholar
|
Frahm, J.-P. 2004. A new contribution to the moss flora of Baltic and Saxon amber. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 129: 81 101.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
FRAHM J.-P. 2005. The genus Hypnodontopsis (Bryopsida, Rhachitheciaceae) in Baltic and Saxon amber. Bryologist 108: 228–235.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Frahm, J.-P. 2010. Die Laubmoosflora des Baltischen Bernsteinwaldes. Jena, Weissdorn Verlag, 101 pp.Google Scholar, www
|
Gangulee, H.C. 1971. Mosses of Eastern India and adjacent regions. Part 2. Privately published, Calcutta: 177–566.Google Scholar
|
Gцppert, H.R. 1853. Ьber die Bernsteinflora. Monatsberichte der Kцniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin [1853]: 450–477.Google Scholar
|
GЦPPERT H.R. & G.C. BERENDT. 1845. Der Bernstein und die in ihm befindlichen Pflanzenreste der Vorwelt. Commission der Nicolaischen Buchhandlung, Berlin.Google Scholar
|
Higuchi, M. 2011. Endemic species of bryophytes in Japan. Bulletin of the National Science Museum. Series B, Botany 37(3): 117–126.Google Scholar
|
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2011. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine). Arctoa 20: 1–18.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2013. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine), 2. Arctoa 22: 83–92.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Ignatov, M.S. & E.E. Perkovsky. 2016. Mosses from Rovno amber (Ukraine). 3. Pottiodicranum, a new moss genus from the Late Eocene. Arctoa 25: 229–235.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Konopka, A. S., P. S. Herendeen & P. R. Crane. 1998. Sporophytes and gametophytes of Dicranaceae from the Santonian (Late Cretaceous) of Georgia, USA. American Journal of Botany 85: 714 723.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Kozub,D., V. Khmelik, Yu. Shapoval, V. CHentsov, S. Yatsenko, B. Litovchenko & V. Starykh. 2008. . Helicon Focus Software. http://www.heliconsoft.comGoogle Scholar
|
SHARP, A. J. , H. CRUM, & P. M. ECKEL. 1994. The moss flora of Mexico, Part 1-2,. Memories of The New York Botanical Garden, 69, New York. 1113 p. Google Scholar, Crossref
|
SCHIMPER, W.P. 1869. Traitй de palйontologie vйgйtale. Vol. 1. J. B. Bailliиre et Fils, Paris.Google Scholar
|
Wolfe, A.P., R.C. McKellar, R. Tappert, R.N.S. Sodhi & K. Muehlenbachs. 2016. Bitterfeld amber is not Baltic amber: Three geochemical tests and further constraints on the botanical affinities of succinite. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 225: 21–32.Google Scholar, Crossref
|