On the systematic position of Discelium (Bryophyta)
Michael S. Ignatov, Vladimir E. Fedosov, Alina V. Fedorova, Elena A. Ignatova

Literature Cited
Anderson, L. E., H.A. Crum & W.R. Buck. 1990. List of mosses of North America north of Mexico. The Bryologist 93: 448 499.Google Scholar, Crossref
Brotherus,V.F. . 1924. . Musci. In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2, 10. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot: 143–478.Google Scholar
Corley, M.F.V., A.C. Crundwell, R. Düll, M.O. Hill & A.J.E. Smith. 1981. Mosses of Europe and the Azores: an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. Journal of bryology 11: 609 689.Google Scholar, Crossref
Cox, C.J., B. Goffinet, N.J. Wickett, S.B. Boles & A.J. Shaw. 2010. Moss diversity: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175 195.Google Scholar, Crossref
Fedosov, V.E., A.V. Fedorova, A.E. Fedosov & M.S. Ignatov. 2016. Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae s.l. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181(2): 139 155.Google Scholar, Crossref
Fedosov, V.E., A.V. Fedorova, E.A. Ignatova, V.K. Bobrova & A.V. Troitsky. 2015. Rps4 and nad5 sequences indicate polyphyly of Ditrichaceae and parallelisms in the evolution of haplolepideous mosses. Molecular Biology 49: 890–894.Google Scholar, Crossref
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.Google Scholar, Crossref
Frey,W. & M. Stech. 2009. . Bryophyta (Musci, mosses). In: Frey, W. (ed.). Syllabus of plant families A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Part 3. Bryophytes and seedless vascular plants. 13th ed. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany: 116–257.Google Scholar
Goffinet,B., W.R. Buck & A.J. Shaw. 2009. . Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B. & A.J. Shaw (eds.). Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 55–138.Google Scholar
Goffinet, B. C. J. Cox. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among basal-most arthrodontous mosses with special emphasis on the evolutionary significance of the Funariaceae. – Bryologist 103(2): 212-223. Google Scholar, Crossref
Goffinet, B. C.J. Cox, A.J. Shaw & T.A.J. Hedderson. 2001. The Bryophyta (Mosses): systematic and evolutionary inferences from an rps4 Gene (cpDNA) phylogeny. Annals of Botany 87: 191 208.Google Scholar, Crossref
Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.Google Scholar
Horton, D.G. 1983. A revision of the Encalyptaceae (Musci) with particular reference to the north American taxa Part II. Journal of the Hattori BotanicalLaboratory 54: 353–532.Google Scholar
Huttunen, S., N. Bell, V.K Bobrova, V. Buchbender, W.R. Buck, C.J Cox, B. Goffinet, L. Hedenas, B.-C. Ho, M.S Ignatov, M. Krug, O. Kuznetsova, I.A Milyutina, A. Newton, S. Olsson, L. Pokorny, J.A. Shaw, M. Stech, A. Troit­sky, A. Vanderpoorten & D. Quandt. 2012. Disentangling knots of rapid evolution: origin and diversification of the moss order Hypnales. Journal of Bryology 34: 187 211.Google Scholar, Crossref
Huttunen, S. , S. Olsson, V. Buchbender, J. Enroth, L. Hedenäs & D. Quandt. 2012. b. Phylogeny-based comparative methods question the adaptive nature of sporophytic specialisations (in mosses). PlosOne 7: e48268. Google Scholar
Huttunen, S., M.S. Ignatov, K. Müller, & D. Quandt. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families: Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae, and Lembophyllaceae. In: B. Goffinet, V. Hollowell and R. Magill (eds.) Molecular systematics of Bryophytes. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 328–361.Google Scholar, www
[Ignatov, M.S. & E.A. Ignatova] Игнатов М.С., Е.А. Игнатова. 2003. Флора мхов средней части Европейской России. Т.1. [Moss flora of Middle Part of European Russia, V.1] Москва, КМК [Moscow, KMK], 608 pp.Google Scholar, www
Ignatov, M.S., U.N. Spirina, E.A. Ignatova, M. Krug & D. Quandt. 2015. On the systematic position of the moss genus Catoscopium, with a new approach to the peristome reduction study. Arctoa 24: 389–415.Google Scholar, Crossref
Inoue, Y. & H. Tsubota. 2014. On the systematic position of the genus Timmiella (Dicranidae, Bryopsida) and its allied genera, with the description of a new family Timmiellaceae. Phytotaxa 181: 151 162.Google Scholar, Crossref
Keane, T., C. Creevey, M. Pentony, T. Naughton & J. Mclnerney. 2006. Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 29.Google Scholar
Larraín, J., F. Herrera, J.M. Budke & B. Goffinet. 2009. Phylogenetic affinities and conservation status of the Chilean endemic Costesia spongiosa (Gigaspermaceae). The Bryologist 112: 278–286.Google Scholar, Crossref
Rambaut,A. & A.J. Drummond. 2007. . Tracer v1.4. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author, available at: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. [Accessed 27 November 2016].Google Scholar
Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D.L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Hцhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M.A. Suchard & J.P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539 542.Google Scholar, Crossref
Sainsbury, G.O.K. 1948. Bryobartramiaceae, a new moss family. The Bryologist 51: 9–13.Google Scholar, Crossref
Schimper, W. P. 1856. Corollarium Bryologiae Europaeae. E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart. 140 pp.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688 2690. Google Scholar, Crossref
Stone, I.G. 1977. Some morphological and anatomical features of the monotypic genus Bryobartramia Sainsbury (Musci). Australian Journal of Botany 25: 141–157.Google Scholar, Crossref
Tsubota, H., E. De Luna, D. González, M.S. Ignatov & H. Deguchi. 2004. Molecular phylogenetics and ordinal relationships based on analyses of a large-scale data set of 600 rbcL sequences of mosses. Hikobia 14: 149–170.Google Scholar, www
Vitt, D.H. 1981. Adaptive modes of the moss sporophyte. The Bryologist 84(2): 166 186.Google Scholar, Crossref
Wahrmund, U., T. Rein, K.F. Müller, M. Groth-Malonek, & V. Knoop. 2009. Fifty mosses on five trees: comparing phylogenetic information in three types of non-coding mitochondrial DNA and two chloroplast loci. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 241–255.Google Scholar, Crossref
Werner, O., R.M. Ros, M.J. Cano & J. Guerra. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of Pottiaceae (Musci) based on chloroplast rps4 sequence data. Plant systematics and evolution 243: 147–164.Google Scholar, Crossref
Zander, R. H. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 32: 378 pp. Google Scholar