Buxbaumia: a moss peristome without a peristomial

Literature Cited
Berthier,J. 1971. Recherches sur la structure et le développement de l’apex du gamétophyte feuillé des mousses. Revue Bryologique et Lichénologique 38: 421–551.Google Scholar
Blomquist,H.L. & L.L. Robertson. 1941. The development of the peristome in Aulacomnium heterostichum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 65: 569–584.Google Scholar
Brotherus,V.F. 1924. Musci. In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2, 10. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot: 143–478.Google Scholar
Brotherus,V. F. 1925. Musci. In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2, 11: Berlin: Duncker and Humblot:1–542.Google Scholar
Budke,J.M., C.S. Jones & B. Goffinet. 2007. Development of the enigmatic peristome of Timmia megapolitana (Timmiaceae; Bryophyta). American Journal of Botany 94(3): 460–467.Google Scholar, Crossref
Campbell,D.H. 1918. The Structure and Development of Mosses and Ferns. ed. 3. Macmillan & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
Cox,C.J., B. Goffinet, N.J. Wickett, S.B. Boles & A.J. Shaw. 2010. Moss diversity: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175–195.Google Scholar, Crossref
Crum,H.A. & L E. Anderson. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America. Vol. 2. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 665–1328.Google Scholar
Edwards,S.R. 1979. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepideous moss peristomes. In: Clarke, G.C.S. & J.G. Duckett (eds.). Bryophyte systematics. Academic Press, London, UK.: 317–346.Google Scholar
Edwards,S.R. 1984. Homologies and inter-relations of moss peristomes. In: Schuster, R.M. (ed.) New manual of bryology, vol. 2. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan: 658–695.Google Scholar
FedosovV.E., A.V. Fedorova, A.E. Fedosov & M.S. Ignatov. 2016. Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae s.l. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 139–155.Google Scholar
Frey,W. & M. Stech. 2009. Bryophyta (Musci, mosses). In: Frey, W. (ed.). Syllabus of plant families A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Part 3. Bryophytes and seedless vascular plants. 13th ed. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany: 116–257.Google Scholar
Hedwig,J. 1801. Species Muscorum Frondosorum. Lipsiae, 352 pp.Google Scholar
Huttunen,S., M. S. Ignatov, K. Müller & D. Quandt. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae, and Lembophyllaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 328–361.Google Scholar
Huttunen,S., S. Olsson, V. Buchbender, J. Enroth, L. Hedenäs & D. Quandt. 2012. Phylogeny–based comparative methods question the adaptive nature of sporophytic specializations in mosses. PLos One 7(10): e48268.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov,M.S., U.N. Spirina, E.A. Ignatova, M. Krug & D. Quandt. 2015. On the systematic position of the moss genus Catoscopium, with a new approach to the peristome reduction study. Arctoa 24(2): 389–415.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov,M.S., U.N. Spirina, M.A. Kolesnikova, D.A. Ashikhmina, E.A. Ignatova & S.V. Polevova. 2018. Peristome development pattern in Encalypta poses a problem: what is the primary peristomial layer in mosses? Arctoa 27(1): 1–17.Google Scholar, Crossref
Kienitz-Gerloff,F. 1878. Untersuchungen uber die Entwick- lungsgeschichte der Laubmooskapsel und die Embryoen- twicklung einiger Polypodiaceen. Botanische Zeitung 36: 33–64.Google Scholar
Kreulen,D.J.W. 1972. Features of single- and double-peristomate capsules.Homology of the layersand ontogeny of the outer spore sac. Lindbergia 1: 153–160.Google Scholar
Lawton,E. 1971. Moss Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichi-nan, Japan, 362 pp. + 195 pl.Google Scholar
[Lazarenko,A.S.] Лазаренко А.С. 1955. Определитель лиственных мхов Украины. [Handbook of mosses of Ukraine] Киев, Изд-во АН УССР [Kiev, Izd. Akad. Nauk UkrSSR], 468 pp.Google Scholar
Newton,A.E., C.J. Cox, J.G. Duckett, J.A. Wheeler, B. Goffinet, T.A.J. Hedderson & B.D. Mishler. 2000. Evolution of the major moss lineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. Bryologist 103: 187–211.Google Scholar, Crossref
Philibert,H. 1888. De l’importance du peristome pour les affinits naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 15: 6–12, 24–28, 37–44, 50–60, 65–69.Google Scholar
Schofield,W.B. 2007. Buxbaumiaceae. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.) Flora of North America North of Mexico 27: 118–120.Google Scholar
Schwartz,O.M. 1994. The development of the peristome-forming layers in the Funariaceae. International Journal of Plant Science 155: 640–657.Google Scholar
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1987. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution 1. Diphyscium foliosum (Diphysciaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 45: 55–70.Google Scholar
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1989.  Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 14: 24–36.Google Scholar
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1989.  Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution IV. Haplolepideae: Ditrichaceae and Dicranaceae. Bryologist 92: 314–323.Google Scholar, Crossref
Shaw,A.J., P. Szövényi & B. Shaw. 2011. Bryophyte diversity and evolution: windows into the early evolution of land plants. American Journal of Botany 98(3): 352–369.Google Scholar, Crossref
Spirina,U. N. & M. S. Ignatov. 2005. A comparison of early stages of branch development in Brachythecium and Calliergon (Bryophyta). Arctoa 14: 211–222.Google Scholar, Crossref
Taylor,E. C. 1962. The Philibert peristome articles. An abridged translation. Bryologist 65: 175–212.Google Scholar, Crossref
Tsubota,H., E. De Luna, D. González, M.S. Ignatov & H. Deguchi. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic and ordinal relationships based on analyses of a lage-scale datd set of 600 rbcL sequences of mosses. Hikobia 14: 149–170.Google Scholar
Wenderoth,H. 1931. Beiträge zur Kentnis des Sporophyten von Polytrichum juniperinum. Willdenow. Planta 14: 244–385.Google Scholar