Buxbaumia: a moss peristome without a peristomial
M. S. IGNATOV, U. N. SPIRINA, M. A. KOLESNIKOVA, L. F. VOLOSNOVA, S. V. POLEVOVA, E. A. IGNATOVA

Literature Cited
Berthier,J. 1971. Recherches sur la structure et le développement de l’apex du gamétophyte feuillé des mousses. Revue Bryologique et Lichénologique 38: 421–551.Google Scholar
Blomquist,H.L. & L.L. Robertson. 1941. The development of the peristome in Aulacomnium heterostichum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 65: 569–584.Google Scholar
Brotherus,V.F. 1924. Musci. In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2, 10. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot: 143–478.Google Scholar
Brotherus,V. F. 1925. Musci. In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl (eds.). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2, 11: Berlin: Duncker and Humblot:1–542.Google Scholar
Budke,J.M., C.S. Jones & B. Goffinet. 2007. Development of the enigmatic peristome of Timmia megapolitana (Timmiaceae; Bryophyta). American Journal of Botany 94(3): 460–467.Google Scholar, Crossref
Campbell,D.H. 1918. The Structure and Development of Mosses and Ferns. ed. 3. Macmillan & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
Cox,C.J., B. Goffinet, N.J. Wickett, S.B. Boles & A.J. Shaw. 2010. Moss diversity: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175–195.Google Scholar, Crossref
Crum,H.A. & L E. Anderson. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America. Vol. 2. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 665–1328.Google Scholar
Edwards,S.R. 1979. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepideous moss peristomes. In: Clarke, G.C.S. & J.G. Duckett (eds.). Bryophyte systematics. Academic Press, London, UK.: 317–346.Google Scholar
Edwards,S.R. 1984. Homologies and inter-relations of moss peristomes. In: Schuster, R.M. (ed.) New manual of bryology, vol. 2. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan: 658–695.Google Scholar
FedosovV.E., A.V. Fedorova, A.E. Fedosov & M.S. Ignatov. 2016. Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae s.l. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 139–155.Google Scholar
Frey,W. & M. Stech. 2009. Bryophyta (Musci, mosses). In: Frey, W. (ed.). Syllabus of plant families A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Part 3. Bryophytes and seedless vascular plants. 13th ed. Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany: 116–257.Google Scholar
Hedwig,J. 1801. Species Muscorum Frondosorum. Lipsiae, 352 pp.Google Scholar
Huttunen,S., M. S. Ignatov, K. Müller & D. Quandt. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae, and Lembophyllaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 328–361.Google Scholar
Huttunen,S., S. Olsson, V. Buchbender, J. Enroth, L. Hedenäs & D. Quandt. 2012. Phylogeny–based comparative methods question the adaptive nature of sporophytic specializations in mosses. PLos One 7(10): e48268.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov,M.S., U.N. Spirina, E.A. Ignatova, M. Krug & D. Quandt. 2015. On the systematic position of the moss genus Catoscopium, with a new approach to the peristome reduction study. Arctoa 24(2): 389–415.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ignatov,M.S., U.N. Spirina, M.A. Kolesnikova, D.A. Ashikhmina, E.A. Ignatova & S.V. Polevova. 2018. Peristome development pattern in Encalypta poses a problem: what is the primary peristomial layer in mosses? Arctoa 27(1): 1–17.Google Scholar, Crossref
Kienitz-Gerloff,F. 1878. Untersuchungen uber die Entwick- lungsgeschichte der Laubmooskapsel und die Embryoen- twicklung einiger Polypodiaceen. Botanische Zeitung 36: 33–64.Google Scholar
Kreulen,D.J.W. 1972. Features of single- and double-peristomate capsules.Homology of the layersand ontogeny of the outer spore sac. Lindbergia 1: 153–160.Google Scholar
Lawton,E. 1971. Moss Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichi-nan, Japan, 362 pp. + 195 pl.Google Scholar
[Lazarenko,A.S.] Лазаренко А.С. 1955. Определитель лиственных мхов Украины. [Handbook of mosses of Ukraine] Киев, Изд-во АН УССР [Kiev, Izd. Akad. Nauk UkrSSR], 468 pp.Google Scholar
Newton,A.E., C.J. Cox, J.G. Duckett, J.A. Wheeler, B. Goffinet, T.A.J. Hedderson & B.D. Mishler. 2000. Evolution of the major moss lineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. Bryologist 103: 187–211.Google Scholar, Crossref
Philibert,H. 1888. De l’importance du peristome pour les affinits naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 15: 6–12, 24–28, 37–44, 50–60, 65–69.Google Scholar
Schofield,W.B. 2007. Buxbaumiaceae. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.) Flora of North America North of Mexico 27: 118–120.Google Scholar
Schwartz,O.M. 1994. The development of the peristome-forming layers in the Funariaceae. International Journal of Plant Science 155: 640–657.Google Scholar
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1987. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution 1. Diphyscium foliosum (Diphysciaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 45: 55–70.Google Scholar
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1989.  Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 14: 24–36.Google Scholar
Shaw,A.J., L.E. Anderson & B.D. Mishler. 1989.  Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution IV. Haplolepideae: Ditrichaceae and Dicranaceae. Bryologist 92: 314–323.Google Scholar, Crossref
Shaw,A.J., P. Szövényi & B. Shaw. 2011. Bryophyte diversity and evolution: windows into the early evolution of land plants. American Journal of Botany 98(3): 352–369.Google Scholar, Crossref
Spirina,U. N. & M. S. Ignatov. 2005. A comparison of early stages of branch development in Brachythecium and Calliergon (Bryophyta). Arctoa 14: 211–222.Google Scholar, Crossref
Taylor,E. C. 1962. The Philibert peristome articles. An abridged translation. Bryologist 65: 175–212.Google Scholar, Crossref
Tsubota,H., E. De Luna, D. González, M.S. Ignatov & H. Deguchi. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic and ordinal relationships based on analyses of a lage-scale datd set of 600 rbcL sequences of mosses. Hikobia 14: 149–170.Google Scholar
Wenderoth,H. 1931. Beiträge zur Kentnis des Sporophyten von Polytrichum juniperinum. Willdenow. Planta 14: 244–385.Google Scholar