Epiphytic bryophytes in Latvian manor parks
A. Mežaka, D. Stepanova, P. Evarts-Bunders

Literature Cited
[Āboliņa,A.A.] Аболинь, A.А. 1968. Листостебельные мхи Латвийской ССР. [Mosses of the Latvian SSR]. - Riga, Zinatne, 329 pp.Google Scholar
Āboliņa,A. 1994. Latvijas retās un aizsargājamās sūnas. Rīga, LU Ekoloģiskā centra apgāds “Vide”, 24 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
Āboliņa,A. & B. Bambe. 2010. Dažas epifītisko sūnu sastopamības īpatnības apdzīvotajās vietās. In: Ģeogrāfija, Ģeoloģija, Vides zinātne. Latvijas Universitātes 68. zinātniskā konference. Referātu tēzes. 26-28 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
Avotniece,Z., S. Aniskevich & E. Malinovskis. 2017. Climate change scenarios for Latvia. Report Summary. Riga, State Ltd. “Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre”, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Barkman,J.J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Assen, Van Gorcum. 628 pp.Google Scholar
Baselga,A., D. Orme, S. Villeger, J. De Bortoli, F. Leprieur, & M. Logez. 2020. Betapart: Partitioning Beta Diversity into Turnover and Nestedness Components. R package version 1.5.2. CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapartGoogle Scholar
Bates,D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, & S. Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1).Google Scholar, Crossref
Ek,T., U. Suško & R. Auzinš. 2002. Inventory of woodland key habitats. Methodology. Riga, 73 pp.Google Scholar
Fudali,E., & L. Żołnierz. 2019. Epiphytic bryophytes in urban forests of Wrocław (SW Poland). Biodiversity Research and Conservation, 53(1): 73–83.Google Scholar, Crossref
Gerra-Inohosa,L. 2018. Saistība starp epifītu daudzveidību un koku sugu mežaudzēs ar parasto osi Fraxinus excelsior. Latvijas Veģetācija, 75–85. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
Großmann,J., P. Pyttel, J. Bauhus, B. Lecigne & C. Messier. 2020. The benefits of tree wounds: Microhabitat development in urban trees as affected by intensive tree maintenance. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 55(X/2019).Google Scholar, Crossref
Hodgetts,N. G., L. Söderström, T.L. Blockeel, S. Caspari, M.S. Ignatov, N.A. Konstantinova, N. Lockhart, B. Papp, C. Schroeck, M. Sim-Sim, D. Bell, N.E. Bell, H.H. Blom, M.A. Bruggeman-Nannenga, M. Brugués, J. Enroth, K.I. Flatberg, R. Garilleti, L. Hedenäs & R.D. Porley. 2020. An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus. Journal of Bryology 42(1): 1–116.Google Scholar, Crossref
Janelis,I. M. 2010. Latvijas muižu dārzi un parki. Rīga, Neputns. 303 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
Kabucis,I. 1995. Ģeobotāniskie rajoni. In: Kavacs G. (red.). Latvijas daba 2. – Rīga, Latvijas Enciklopēdija, 136. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
Kent,M. 2012. Vegetation description and data analysis. A practical approach. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell. 422 pp.Google Scholar
Laiviņš,M. 2009. Atlas of Latvian woody plants. Salaspils, Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas institūts. 606 pp.Google Scholar
Liira,J, A. Suija, & I. Jüriado. 2020. Habitat and host specificity of epiphytic lichens in a rural landscape: cultural heritage habitats as refugia. Biodiversity and Conservation 29(7): 2141–2160.Google Scholar, Crossref
Liira,J., K. Lõhmus & E. Tuisk. 2012. Old manor parks as potential habitats for forest flora in agricultural landscapes of Estonia. Biological Conservation 146(1): 144–154.Google Scholar, Crossref
Fox,J. & S. Weisberg. 2019. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression, Third Edition CA: Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
Lőhmus,K., & J. Liira. 2013. Old rural parks support higher biodiversity than forest remnants. Basic and Applied Ecology 14(2): 165–173.Google Scholar, Crossref
McDonald,L., M. Van Woudenberg, B. Dorin, A.M. Adcock, R.T. McMullin & K. Cottenie. 2017. The effects of bark quality on corticolous lichen community composition in urban parks of southern Ontario. Botany 95(12): 1141–1149.Google Scholar, Crossref
Mežaka,A. & J. Kirillova. 2019. Epiphytic bryophytes and lichens and their functional trail relationships with host characteristics in the Lūznava manor park. Acta Biologica Universitatis Daugavpiliensis 19(2): 241–251.Google Scholar
Neilande,A. (ed.). 1999. Apstādījumu veidotāju ceļvedis Latvijas kokaudzētavu sortamentā 1999-2000. Latvijas Ainavu arhitektūras biedrība. 166 pp.Google Scholar
Nutt,N., S. Nurme, M. Hiob, S. Salmistu, & Z. Kotval. 2013. Restoring manor parks: Exploring and specifying original design and character through the study of dendrologous plants in estonian historica manor parks. Baltic Forestry 19(2): 280–288.Google Scholar
Oishi,Y., & T. Hiura. 2017. Bryophytes as bioindicators of the atmospheric environment in urban-forest landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 167(7): 348–355.Google Scholar, Crossref
PētersoneA. & K. Birkmane. 1980. Latvijas PSR augu noteicējs. Rīga, Zvaigzne. 590 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2017. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Белгородской области. [Bryoflora of old manor parks in Belgorod Region]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal] 102(9): 1258–1269.Google Scholar
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2018. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Воронежской области. [Bryoflora of manor parks in Voronezh region]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal] 103(5): 586–606.Google Scholar
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2019. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Тамбовской области. [Moss flora of manor parks in Tambov region] Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal]104(3): 363–376.Google Scholar, Crossref
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2020. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Саратовской области. [Bryoflora of old manor parks in Saratov Region]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal] 105(5): 419–428.Google Scholar, Crossref
Sabovljević,M., & S. Grdović. 2009. Bryophyte diversity within urban areas: Case study of the city of Belgrade (Serbia). International Journal of Botany 5(1): 85–92.Google Scholar, Crossref
Smith,R. M., K. Thompson, P.H. Warren & K.J. Gaston. 2010. Urban domestic gardens (XIII): Composition of the bryophyte and lichen floras, and determinants of species richness. Biological Conservation 143(4): 873–882.Google Scholar, Crossref
Truchan,M. & Z. Sobisz. 2015. Protected, rare, endangered and interesting vascular plants in the former manor parks of central part of Polish Pomerania. Baltic Coastal Zone 19: 103–116.Google Scholar