Literature Cited |
[Āboliņa,A.A.] Аболинь, A.А. 1968. Листостебельные мхи Латвийской ССР. [Mosses of the Latvian SSR]. - Riga, Zinatne, 329 pp.Google Scholar
|
Āboliņa,A. 1994. Latvijas retās un aizsargājamās sūnas. Rīga, LU Ekoloģiskā centra apgāds “Vide”, 24 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
|
Āboliņa,A. & B. Bambe. 2010. Dažas epifītisko sūnu sastopamības īpatnības apdzīvotajās vietās. In: Ģeogrāfija, Ģeoloģija, Vides zinātne. Latvijas Universitātes 68. zinātniskā konference. Referātu tēzes. 26-28 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
|
Avotniece,Z., S. Aniskevich & E. Malinovskis. 2017. Climate change scenarios for Latvia. Report Summary. Riga, State Ltd. “Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre”, 17 pp.Google Scholar
|
Barkman,J.J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Assen, Van Gorcum. 628 pp.Google Scholar
|
Baselga,A., D. Orme, S. Villeger, J. De Bortoli, F. Leprieur, & M. Logez. 2020. Betapart: Partitioning Beta Diversity into Turnover and Nestedness Components. R package version 1.5.2. CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapartGoogle Scholar
|
Bates,D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, & S. Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1).Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Ek,T., U. Suško & R. Auzinš. 2002. Inventory of woodland key habitats. Methodology. Riga, 73 pp.Google Scholar
|
Fudali,E., & L. Żołnierz. 2019. Epiphytic bryophytes in urban forests of Wrocław (SW Poland). Biodiversity Research and Conservation, 53(1): 73–83.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Gerra-Inohosa,L. 2018. Saistība starp epifītu daudzveidību un koku sugu mežaudzēs ar parasto osi Fraxinus excelsior. Latvijas Veģetācija, 75–85. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
|
Großmann,J., P. Pyttel, J. Bauhus, B. Lecigne & C. Messier. 2020. The benefits of tree wounds: Microhabitat development in urban trees as affected by intensive tree maintenance. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 55(X/2019).Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Hodgetts,N. G., L. Söderström, T.L. Blockeel, S. Caspari, M.S. Ignatov, N.A. Konstantinova, N. Lockhart, B. Papp, C. Schroeck, M. Sim-Sim, D. Bell, N.E. Bell, H.H. Blom, M.A. Bruggeman-Nannenga, M. Brugués, J. Enroth, K.I. Flatberg, R. Garilleti, L. Hedenäs & R.D. Porley. 2020. An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus. Journal of Bryology 42(1): 1–116.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Janelis,I. M. 2010. Latvijas muižu dārzi un parki. Rīga, Neputns. 303 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
|
Kabucis,I. 1995. Ģeobotāniskie rajoni. In: Kavacs G. (red.). Latvijas daba 2. – Rīga, Latvijas Enciklopēdija, 136. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
|
Kent,M. 2012. Vegetation description and data analysis. A practical approach. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell. 422 pp.Google Scholar
|
Laiviņš,M. 2009. Atlas of Latvian woody plants. Salaspils, Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas institūts. 606 pp.Google Scholar
|
Liira,J, A. Suija, & I. Jüriado. 2020. Habitat and host specificity of epiphytic lichens in a rural landscape: cultural heritage habitats as refugia. Biodiversity and Conservation 29(7): 2141–2160.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Liira,J., K. Lõhmus & E. Tuisk. 2012. Old manor parks as potential habitats for forest flora in agricultural landscapes of Estonia. Biological Conservation 146(1): 144–154.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Fox,J. & S. Weisberg. 2019. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression, Third Edition CA: Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
|
Lőhmus,K., & J. Liira. 2013. Old rural parks support higher biodiversity than forest remnants. Basic and Applied Ecology 14(2): 165–173.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
McDonald,L., M. Van Woudenberg, B. Dorin, A.M. Adcock, R.T. McMullin & K. Cottenie. 2017. The effects of bark quality on corticolous lichen community composition in urban parks of southern Ontario. Botany 95(12): 1141–1149.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Mežaka,A. & J. Kirillova. 2019. Epiphytic bryophytes and lichens and their functional trail relationships with host characteristics in the Lūznava manor park. Acta Biologica Universitatis Daugavpiliensis 19(2): 241–251.Google Scholar
|
Neilande,A. (ed.). 1999. Apstādījumu veidotāju ceļvedis Latvijas kokaudzētavu sortamentā 1999-2000. Latvijas Ainavu arhitektūras biedrība. 166 pp.Google Scholar
|
Nutt,N., S. Nurme, M. Hiob, S. Salmistu, & Z. Kotval. 2013. Restoring manor parks: Exploring and specifying original design and character through the study of dendrologous plants in estonian historica manor parks. Baltic Forestry 19(2): 280–288.Google Scholar
|
Oishi,Y., & T. Hiura. 2017. Bryophytes as bioindicators of the atmospheric environment in urban-forest landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 167(7): 348–355.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
PētersoneA. & K. Birkmane. 1980. Latvijas PSR augu noteicējs. Rīga, Zvaigzne. 590 pp. (In Latvian).Google Scholar
|
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2017. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Белгородской области. [Bryoflora of old manor parks in Belgorod Region]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal] 102(9): 1258–1269.Google Scholar
|
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2018. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Воронежской области. [Bryoflora of manor parks in Voronezh region]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal] 103(5): 586–606.Google Scholar
|
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2019. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Тамбовской области. [Moss flora of manor parks in Tambov region] Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal]104(3): 363–376.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
[Popova,N. N.] Попова, Н.Н. 2020. Бриофлора старинных усадебных парков Саратовской области. [Bryoflora of old manor parks in Saratov Region]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskij Zhurnal] 105(5): 419–428.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Sabovljević,M., & S. Grdović. 2009. Bryophyte diversity within urban areas: Case study of the city of Belgrade (Serbia). International Journal of Botany 5(1): 85–92.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Smith,R. M., K. Thompson, P.H. Warren & K.J. Gaston. 2010. Urban domestic gardens (XIII): Composition of the bryophyte and lichen floras, and determinants of species richness. Biological Conservation 143(4): 873–882.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
Truchan,M. & Z. Sobisz. 2015. Protected, rare, endangered and interesting vascular plants in the former manor parks of central part of Polish Pomerania. Baltic Coastal Zone 19: 103–116.Google Scholar
|