Integrative taxonomic revision of the genus Campylopus (Leucobryaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia
V. E. Fedosov, A. V. Fedorova, E. I. Ignatova

Literature Cited
Bakalin,V.A., V.E. Fedosov, O.Yu. Pisarenko & E.A. Borovichev. 2019. The bryophyte flora of northern Iturup (North-West Pacific): between the Circumboreal and East Asian Floristic Regions. Journal of Bryology 40(3): 249–262.Google Scholar, Crossref
Bonfim-Santos,M. & M. Stech. 2017. Testing hypotheses on suprageneric relationships and morphological evolution in the Leucobryaceae (Bryophyta). Plant Systematics and Evolution 303: 1383–1397.Google Scholar
Dolnik,C. & M.G. Napreenko. 2007. The bryophytes of the southern Curonian Spit (Baltic Sea coast). Arctoa 16: 35–46.Google Scholar
Fedosov,V.E., A.V. Fedorova, A.E. Fedosov & M.S. Ignatov. 2016. Phylogenetic inference and peristome evolution in haplolepideous mosses, focusing on Pseudoditrichaceae and Ditrichaceae s. l. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 139–155.Google Scholar
Frahm,J.-P. 1983. A monograph of Pilopogon Brid. Lindbergia 9(2): 99–116.Google Scholar
Frahm,J.-P. 2007. Campylopus. In: Flora of North America Editorial commetee. Flora of North America. Vol. 27. Pp. 366–376.Google Scholar
Frahm,J.-P. & D.H. Vitt. 1978. A taxonomic study of Campylopus schimperi and C. subulatus (Bryopsida: Dicranaceae) in North America. Brittonia 30(3): 365–372.Google Scholar
Gama,R., A.L.A. Faria, P.E.A.S. Câmara & M. Stech. 2017. Identity and origin of the Campylopus (Leucobryaceae, Bryopsida) species from Trindade Island (Brazil). Cryptogamie, Bryologie 37(3): 241–250.Google Scholar
Gama,R., J. Aguirre-Gutiérrez & M. Stech. 2017. Ecological niche comparison and molecular phylogeny segregate the invasive moss species Campylopus introflexus (Leucobryaceae, Bryophyta) from its closest relatives. Ecology and Evolution 7(19): 8017–8031.Google Scholar
Gardiner,A., M. Ignatov, S. Huttunen & A. Troitsky. 2005. On resurrection of the families Pseudoleskeaceae Schimp. and Pylaisiaceae Schimp. (Musci, Hypnales). Taxon 54: 651–663.Google Scholar
Groß,H. 1914. Zwei bemerkenswerte Moore in Königsbergs Umgebung. Schriften d. Physik.-цkonom. Gesellschaft Kцnigsberg 54: 25–75.Google Scholar
Ignatov,M.S., O.M. Afonina, E.A. Ignatova. 2006. Checklist of mosses of East Europe and North Asia. Arctoa 15: 1–130.Google Scholar
Ignatov,M.S., J. Kučera, L. Hedenäs, O.I. Kuznetsova & E.A. Ignatova. 2020. A revision of the genus Orthothecium (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) in Northern Eurasia. Arctoa 29: 10–48.Google Scholar
Ignatova,E.A. & T.Yu. Samkova. 2006. Campylopus umbellatus (Arn.) Paris (Leucobryaceae, Musci) – a new species for Russia. Arctoa 15: 215–218.Google Scholar
LaFarge-England, C., B.D. Mishler, J.A. Wheeler, D.P. Wall, K. Johannes & A.J. Shaw. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the haplolepideous mosses. The Bryologist 103: 257–276.Google Scholar, Crossref
Lüth,M. 2019. Mosses of Europe. A Photographic Flora. Vol. 2. Freiburg, Germany, pp. 329–840.Google Scholar
Katoh,K. & D.N. Standley. 2013. MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780.Google Scholar
Müller,K. 2005. SeqState. Applied Bioinformatics 4(1): 65–69.Google Scholar
LaFarge, C., B.D. Mishler, J.A. Wheeler, D.P. Wall, K. Johannes & A.J. Shaw. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the haplolepideous mosses. The Bryologist 103: 257–276.Google Scholar
Pisarenko,O.Yu., V.E. Fedosov, K.A. Korznikov, A.V. Shkurko, E.A. Ignatova. 2022. Moss flora of the Badzhal Mountain Range (Khabarovsk Territory, Russian Far East). Botanica Pacifica 11(1): 98–114.Google Scholar, Crossref
Rambaut,A., A.J. Drummond, D. Xie, G. Baele & M.A. Suchard. 2018. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904.Google Scholar, Crossref
Ronquist,F., M. Teslenko, P. Van Der Mark, D.L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M.A. Suchard & J.P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.Google Scholar, Crossref
Razgulyaeva,L.V., M.G. Napreenko, Ch. Wolfram & M.S. Ignatov. 2000. Campylopus introflexus (Dicranaceae, Musci) – An addition to the moss flora of Russia. Arctoa 10: 185–189.Google Scholar
Simmons,M.P. & H. Ochoterena. 2000. Gaps as Characters in Sequence-Based Phylogenetic Analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369–381.Google Scholar, Crossref
Spagnuolo,V., S. Terracciano, M. Puglisi & M. Privitera. 2014. The taxonomic status of Campylopus pilifer subsp. Vaporarius and its relationships within Campylopus Brid. (Dicranaceae, Bryophyta). Nova Hedwigia 99(3–4): 501–510.Google Scholar
Stech,M. 2004. Supraspecific circumscription and classification of Campylopus (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida) based on inferences from sequence data. Systematic Botany 29(4): 817–824.Google Scholar
Stech,M., M. Sim-Sim & H.J.D. Kruijer. 2010. Campylopus Brid. (Leucobryaceae) in Macaronesia revisited. Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution 31(1): 154–163.Google Scholar