A rediscovery of Cryptoleptodon remotifolius (Neckeraceae, Bryophyta) in the Caucasus, with comments on its generic placement
M. B. Nosova, O. I. Kuznetsova, E. A. Ignatova, M. S. Ignatov

Literature Cited
BlockeelTL, Hugonnot V, Enroth J, Ignatov MS, Kuznetsova OI. 2023. Alleniella aegaea Blockeel & Hugonnot (Neckeraceae), a new moss species from the Aegean Islands of Greece. Acta Biologica Plantarum Agriensis 11: 225–249.Google Scholar, Crossref
BrotherusVF. 1892. Enumeratio muscorum Caucasi. Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae 19(12): 1-170.Google Scholar, Crossref
ChopraRS. 1975. Taxonomy of Indian mosses. Publications & Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi. xl + 631 pp.Google Scholar, Crossref
[ElizbarashviliESh, Gongladze NSh] Элизбарашвили ЭШ, Гонгадзе НШ. 1980. Климатография курортов Грузии. [Climatography of Georgian resorts] Тбилиси, издательство НИИ курортологии и физиотерапии МЗ ГССР [Tbilisi, Izd. NII kurortologii i fizioterapii Ministerstva Zdravookhranenia GSSR], 192 pp.Google Scholar, Crossref
EnrothJ. 1992. Corrections to Cryptoleptodon, Forrstroemia and Leptodon (Leptodontaceae, Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 71: 75–82.Google Scholar
FleischerM. 1917. Kritische Revision von Carl Mullerschen Laubmoosgattungen. Hedwigia 59: 212– 219.Google Scholar
FreyW, Probst W. 1974. Hängeformen von Pseudoleskeella laxiramea (Schiffn.) Broth. und Leucodon immersus Lindb. (Musci) im südkaspischen Waldgebiet (Iran). Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie und zu den Lebensbedingungen. Botanische Jahrbücher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 94: 267–282.Google Scholar
GanguleeHC. 1976. Mosses of eastern India and adjacent regions. Fasc. 5. Isobryales. Published by the author, Calcutta, xxvii- xxxv, 1135-1462.Google Scholar
GardinerA, Ignatov M, Huttunen S, Troitsky A. 2005. On resurrection of the families Pseudoleskeaceae Schimp. and Pylaisiaceae Schimp. (Musci, Hypnales). Taxon 54: 651–663.Google Scholar
GoloboffPA. 1994. NONA: A Tree Searching Program. Tucumán, Argentina: Program and documentation, published by the author.Google Scholar
HedenäsL, Zare H. 2010. The Euxinian-Hyrcanian endemic species Forsstroemia remotifolia (Lindb. ex Broth.) Hedenäs and Zare, comb. nov. (Neckeraceae, Bryophyta). Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 138: 61–67.Google Scholar
HookerWJ. 1836. leones plantarum I. Pis. 1- 100. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green & Longman, London.Google Scholar
HuttunenS, Bell N, Bobrova VK, Buchbender V, Buck WR, Cox CJ, Goffinet B, Hedenäs L, Ho BC, Ignatov MS, Krug M, Kuznetsova OI, Milyutina IA, Newton AE, Olsson S, Pokorny Montero L, Shaw J, Stech M, Troitsky AV, Vanderpoorten A,Quandt D. 2012. Disentangling knots of rapid evolution: origin and diversification of the moss order Hypnales. Journal of Bryology 34(3): 187–211.Google Scholar
IgnatovMS, FedorovaAV, Fedosov VE. 2019. On the taxonomy of Anomodontaceae and Heterocladium (Bryophyta). Arctoa 28: 75–102.Google Scholar
IgnatovMS, Voronkova TV, Kartasheva AS, Spirina UN. 2021. On the branch primordia in Neckera and related genera (Bryophyta). Arctoa 30(2): 434–450.Google Scholar
KralikM, Pavuza R, Melikadze G. 2014. Hydrogeological and speleometeorological dynamics of the Prometheus and Sataplia show-caves, Imereti, Georgia. Journal of Georgian Geophysical Society, Issue (A), Physics of Solid Earth 17: 76–101.Google Scholar
NakhutsrishviliG. 2012. The vegetation of Georgia (South Caucasus). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
NakhutsrishviliG, Zazanashvili N, Batsatsashvili K, Montalvo CS. 2015. Colchic and Hyrcanian forests of the Caucasus: similarities, differences and conservation status. Flora Mediterranea, 25 (Special Issue): 185–192. http: DOI 10.7320/FlMedit25SI.185Google Scholar
NixonKC. 1999. Winclada (BETA) ver. 0.9.9. Available from: http:// www.cladistics.com/about_winc.htmlGoogle Scholar
NoguchiA, Iwatsuki Z. 1989. Illustrated Moss Flora of Japan, Vol. 3. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan: 492–742.Google Scholar
OlssonS, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Huttunen S, Hedenäs L, Quandt D. 2009. Evolution of the Neckeraceae: resolving the backbone phylogeny. Systematics and Biodiversity 7: 419–432.Google Scholar, Crossref
OlssonS, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Hedenäs L, Huttunen S, Quandt D. 2009. Phylogenetic analyses reveal high levels of polyphyly among pleurocarpous lineages as well as novel clades. The Bryologist 112: 447–466.Google Scholar, Crossref
OlssonS, Enroth J, Buchbender V, Hedenäs L, Huttunen S, Quandt D. 2011. Neckera and Thamnobryum (Neckeraceae. Bryopsida): Paraphyletic assemblages. Taxon 60(1): 36–50.Google Scholar
QuandtD, Stech M. 2004. Molecular evolution of the trnTUGUtrnFGAA region in bryophytes. Plant Biology 6: 545–554.Google Scholar
RonquistF, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.Google Scholar
SchiffnerV. 1908. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Bryophyten von Persien und Lydien. Österr. Bot. Z. 58: 341–351.Google Scholar
SotiauxA, Enroth J, Olsson S, Quandt D, Vanderpoorten A. 2009. When morphology and molecules tell us different stories: a case-in-point with Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique endemic moss species from Corsica. Journal of Bryology 31: 186–196.Google Scholar
SpirinaUN, Voronkova TV, Ignatov MS. 2020. Are all paraphyllia the same? Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 858: [1–14].Google Scholar
StarkLR. 1987. A taxonomic monograph of Forsstroemia Lindb. (Bryopsida: Leptodontaceae). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 63: 133–218.Google Scholar
TownsendCC. 1966. Mosses from Iran and Afghanistan. Trans. Brit. Bryol. Soc. 5: 131–135.Google Scholar