On the moss genus Gomankovia from the upper permian of the Russian platform
M. S. Ignatov, U. N. Spirina, T. V. Voronkova, S. V. Polevova

Literature Cited
AristovD.S., A.S. Bashkuev, V.K. Golubev, A.V. Gorochov, E.V. Karasev, D.S. Kopylov, A.G. Ponomarenko, A.P. Rasnitsyn, D.A. Rasnitsyn, N.D. Sinitshenkova, I.D. Sukatsheva, D.V. Vassilenko. 2013. Fossil Insects of the Middle and Upper Permian of European Russia Paleontological Journal 47(7): 641–832.Google Scholar
DonskovD.G. 2015. Moss leaf morphogenesis and its correlation with the leaf shape in Funariaceae (Bryophyta). Arctoa 24(2): 503–508.Google Scholar
FreyW. 1970. Blattentwicklung bei Laubmoosen Nova Hedwigia 20: 463–556.Google Scholar
[GomankovA.V.] Гоманьков А.В. 2002. Флора и стратиграфия татарского яруса Восточно-Европейской платформы. – [Flora and stratigraphy of the Tatarian Stage of the East-European Platform]. Dr.Sc. Thesis, Geological Institute of Russ. Acad. Sci., Moscow.Google Scholar
[GomankovA.V., S.V. Meyen] Гоманьков А.В., С.В.Мейен. 1986. Татариновая флора (состав и распространение в поздней перми Евразии). – [Flora and stratigraphy of the Tatarian Stage of the East-European Platform] Труды геологического института АН СССР [Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR] 401: 1–174.Google Scholar
IgnatovM.S., E.V. Maslova. 2021. Fossil mosses: what do they tell us about moss evolution? Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution 43(1): 72–97.Google Scholar
IgnatovM.S. 1990. Upper Permian mosses from the Russian Platform Palaeontographica Abt. B, 217(4–6): 147–189.Google Scholar
IgnatovM.S., T.V. Voronkova, U.N. Spirina, S.V. Polevova. 2023. Arvildia, an Upper Permian moss and its possible relationships Arctoa 32(2): 243–260.Google Scholar
KozubD., V. Khmelik, Y. Shapoval, S. Chentsov, B. Yatsenko, B. Litovchenko, V. Starykh. 2008. Helicon Focus software http://www.heliconsoft.comGoogle Scholar
LigroneR., J.G. Duckett, K.S. Renzaglia. 2000. Conducting tissues and phyletic relationships of bryophytes Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 355: 795–813.Google Scholar
[NeuburgM.F.] Нейбург М.Ф. 1956. Открытые листостебельных мхов в пермских отложениях СССР. – [he discovery of mosses in the Permian deposits of the USSR] Доклады Академии наук СССР [Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR ] 107(2): 321–324.Google Scholar
[NeuburgM.F.] Нейбург М.Ф. 1960. Листостебельные мхи из пермских отложений Ангариды. – [Mosses from the Permian of Angaraland] Труды геологического института АН СССР [Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR] 19: 1–104 + 78 pl.Google Scholar
TomescuA.M.F., B. Bomfleur, A.C. Bippus, A. Savoretti. 2018. Why are bryophytes so rare in the fossil record? A spotlight on taphonomy and fossil preservation. – In: M. Krings, C. J. Harper, N. R. Cъneo & G. W. Rothwell (eds.) Transformative Paleobotany. Papers to Commemorate the Life and Legacy of Thomas N. Taylor Academic Press, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Pp. 375–416.Google Scholar