| Literature Cited |
| [BachurinaG.F., V.M. Mel’nichuk] Бачурина Г.Ф., В.М. Мельничук. 1988. Флора мохiв Украiнськоi РСР. Андреєвi, брiєвi. Вип. 2. – [Moss flora of Ukrainian SSR. Andreaeopsida, Bryopsida. Pt. 2] Киiв, Наукова Думка [Kyiv, Naukova Dumka], 180 pp.Google Scholar
|
|
| BechtelerJ., G.F. Peсaloza-Bojacá, D. Bell, G. Burleigh, S.F. Mcdaniel, E.C. Davis, E.B. Sessa, A.C. Bippus, D.C. Cargill, S. Chantanaorrapint, I. Draper, L. Endara, L.L. Forrest, R. Garilleti, S.W. Graham, S. Huttunen, J.A. Jáuregui-Lazo, F. Lara, J. Larraín, L.R. Lewis, D.G. Long, D. Quandt, K.S. Renzaglia, A. Schäfer-Verwimp, G.E. Lee, A.M. Sierra, M. Von Konrat, C.E. Zartman, M.R. Pereira, B. Goffinet, J.C. Villarreal. 2023. Comprehensive phylogenomic time tree of bryophytes reveals deep relationships and uncovers gene incongruences in the last 500 million years of diversification. American Journal of Botany 110(11): e16249 [1–20].Google Scholar
|
|
| GardinerA.A., M.S. Ignatov, S. Huttunen, A.V. Troitsky. 2005. On resurrection of the families Pseudoleskeaceae Schimp. and Pylaisiaceae Schimp. (Musci, Hypnales). Taxon 54: 651–663.Google Scholar
|
|
| Hernández-MaquedaR., D. Quandt, O. Werner, J. Muсoz. 2008. Phylogeny and classification of the Grimmiaceae/Ptychomitriaceae complex (Bryophyta) inferred from cpDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 863–877.Google Scholar
|
|
| IgnatovM.S., E.A. Ignatova, V.E. Fedosov, O.V. Ivanov, E.I. Ivanova, M.A. Kolesnikova, S.V. Polevova, U.N. Spirina, T.V. Voronkova. 2016. Andreaeobryum macrosporum (Andreaeobryopsida) in Russia, with additional data on its morphology. Arctoa 25(1): 1–51.Google Scholar
|
|
| IgnatovaE.A. 2001. A new species of Barbula (Pottiaceae, Musci) from Siberia. Arctoa 10: 161–164.Google Scholar
|
|
| InoueY., J. Kučera, H. Kubo, H. Tsubota. 2019. Barbula Chenia (Pottiaceae) New To Japan. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 70(3): 195–199.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| InoueY., H. Tsubota. 2016. Systematics of the family Pottiaceae (Bryophyta) with special reference to the familial and subfamilial circumscriptions. Hikobia 17(2): 117–129.Google Scholar
|
|
| JiménezJ.A., M.J. Cano, J. Guerra. 2022. A multilocus phylogeny of the moss genus Didymodon and allied genera (Pottiaceae): Generic delimitations and their implications for systematics. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 60(2): 281–304.Google Scholar
|
|
| JuratzkaJ. 1874. Muscorum species novae. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 24: 377–378.Google Scholar
|
|
| KatohK., D.N. Standley. 2013. MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780.Google Scholar
|
|
| KučeraJ., J. Košnar, O. Werner. 2013. Partial generic revision of Barbula (Musci: Pottiaceae): re-establishment of Hydrogonium and Streblotrichum, and the new genus Gymnobarbula. Taxon 62(1): 21–39.Google Scholar
|
|
| KučeraJ., P. Sollman, O.M. Afonina, E.A. Ignatova, V.E. Fedosov, J.R. Shevock, D.Ya. Tubanova, M.S. Ignatov. 2020. Range extensions for Bryoerythrophyllum sollmanianum and Tortula yuennanensis (Pottiaceae, Musci) with reconsideration of their phylogenetic affinities including Pararhexophyllum, gen. Nov. Nova Hedwigia Beih. 150: 273–292.Google Scholar
|
|
| [LazarenkoA.S.] Лазаренко А.С. 1938. Матерiали до брiо¬флори Середньоi Азii. – [Materials on brioflora of Middle Asia] Журн. Iнст. Бот. АН УРСР [Zhurn. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Ukr.SSR] 26-67: 191–216.Google Scholar
|
|
| LiX.-J., S. He, Z. Iwatsuki. 2001. Pottiaceae. – In: Moss Flora of China, English Version. Vol.2. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden, Beijing, New York & St. Louis. Pp. 114–249.Google Scholar
|
|
| [MamatkulovU.K., I.O. Baitulin, S.G. Nesterova] Маматкулов У.К., И.О. Байтулин, С.Г. Нестерова. 1998. Мохообразные Средней Азии и Казахстана. – [Bryophytes of the Middle Asia and Kazakhstan] Алматы [Almaty], 232 pp.Google Scholar
|
|
| OlssonS., V. Buchbender, J. Enroth, L. Hedenäs, S. Huttunen, D. Quandt. 2009. Phylogenetic analyses reveal high levels of polyphyly among pleurocarpous lineages as well as novel clades. The Bryologist 112: 447–466.Google Scholar
|
|
| PalisotDe Beauvois A.M.F.J. 1804. Prodrome de l’aethéogamie our d’un traité sur les familles de plantes dont la fructification est extraordinaire. Magasin Encyclopédique 9(5[19]): 289–330.Google Scholar
|
|
| RonquistF. M. Teslenko, P. Van Der Mark, D.L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M.A. Suchard, J.P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology. 61: 539–542.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| [Savicz-LyubitskayaL.I., Z.N. Smirnova] Савич-Любицкая Л.И., З.Н. Смирнова. 1970. Определитель листостебельных мхов СССР. Верхоплодные мхи. – [Handbook of mosses of the USSR. The acrocarpous mosses] Л., Наука [Leningrad, Nauka], 822 pp.Google Scholar
|
|
| TrifinopoulosJ., L. Nguyen, A. Von Haeseler, B.Q. Minh. 2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nuclear Acids Research 44(W1): W232–W235.Google Scholar, Crossref
|
|
| WernerO., R.M. Ros, M. Grundmann. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Trichostomoideae (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) based on nrITS sequence data. Taxon 54(2): 361–368.Google Scholar
|
|
| WhiteT.J. 1990. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. PCR Protocols, a Guide to Methods and Applications: 315–322.Google Scholar
|
|
| ZanderR.H. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences 32: 1–378.Google Scholar
|
|
| ZanderH.R. 2007. Barbula. Flora of North America editorial committee (eds). Flora of North America. Vol. 27. Bryophytes: Mosses, part 1: 529–534.Google Scholar
|
|